Suchprofil: Mindestlohn Durchsuchter Fertigstellungsmonat: 09/21 Sortierung: 1. SSCI-JOURNALS 2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN 3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN 4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER 5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR 6. BEITRÄGE ZU SAMMELWERKEN **************** 1. SSCI-JOURNALS **************** @Article{Francis:2021:IIS, Journal= {Critical social policy}, Volume= {41}, Number= {3}, Author= {David Francis and Imraan Valodia}, Title= {Inequality in the South African labour market: The political economy of the national minimum wage}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {385-403}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183211009893}, Abstract= {"In 2019, South Africa implemented a national minimum wage (NMW) for the first time. This is an important intervention, given that the South African labour market continues to generate some of the highest levels of income and wealth inequality in the world. The minimum wage is intended as a structural intervention to transform the labour market by setting a wage floor, while highlighting larger issues that continue to reproduce inequality in the labour market. The process raises interesting questions about the role of social dialogue in the policy making process, especially at a time when the roles of experts and evidence are contested in political economy. This article reviews the national minimum wage process from two angles: assessing the economic evidence and examining the political economy of minimum wages in South Africa. We take this approach in order to better understand the roles of evidence and politics in the policy making process. While both processes were contested, important differences emerge from the analysis: the economic lens highlights the intersection of evidence and ideology, while a political economy review identifies important lines of contestation in the policy making process itself. The national minimum wage process shows that institutionalised social dialogue continues to be a central part of the policy making process, but that it cannot be taken for granted: the particular configuration of the social dialogue process and the roles assigned to each player matter." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn; Einkommensverteilung; soziale Ungleichheit; Auswirkungen; politische Ökonomie; sozialer Dialog; politischer Entscheidungsprozess; Verteilungseffekte; Einkommenseffekte; Diskurs; Lohnpolitik; Armut; Beschäftigungseffekte; Südafrikanische Republik; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2012-2020}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 1974}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210805K6T}, } @Article{Hafner:2021:DMW, Journal= {Empirical economics}, Number= {online first}, Author= {Lukas Hafner and Benjamin Lochner}, Title= {Do minimum wages improve self-rated health? Evidence from a natural experiment}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {1-26}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02114-3}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-021-02114-3}, Abstract= {"We analyze whether the introduction of the general minimum wage in Germany in 2015 had an effect on workers' self-rated health. To this end, we use survey data linked to administrative employment records and apply difference-in-differences regressions combined with propensity score matching. This approach enables us to control for a vast set of potential confounding variables. We find a health improving effect among the individuals who were most likely to be affected by the reform. Our results indicate that workers' improved satisfaction with pay, their reduced working hours, and a reduction in time pressure at work may drive this result." (Author's abstract, © 2021 Springer) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn; Auswirkungen; Gesundheitszustand; Selbsteinschätzung; abhängig Beschäftigte; IAB-Haushaltspanel; Geringverdiener; psychosoziale Faktoren; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2011-2016}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: I10 ; I18 ; J38}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 786}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210823LE4}, } @Article{Nunn:2021:HLM, Journal= {The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science}, Volume= {695}, Number= {1}, Author= {Ryan Nunn and Jennifer Hunt}, Title= {How Labor Market Institutions Matter for Worker Compensation}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {225-241}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162211035965}, Abstract= {"Labor markets deviate substantially from the competitive ideal, and policies and institutions affect workers' outcomes. Over the last 45 years, the dramatic increase in compensation of high earners and weak or stagnant growth for low and middle earners have shone a spotlight on the ways in which labor market institutions sometimes work to the detriment of lower-paid workers. In this article, we survey several institutions-minimum wages, private sector unions, noncompete agreements, and occupational licensing-considering how they have evolved in ways that affect workers' outcomes, given that the labor market is characterized by uneven distribution of market gains. We describe the modern labor market as one that substantially features alternative work arrangements and labor market concentration, and we consider the implications of this for public policy. Those policies, along with the surveyed institutions, are the focus of our final section that discusses key options for improving worker outcomes." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsmarktpolitik; Lohnpolitik; institutionelle Faktoren; Geringverdiener; Mindestlohn; Gewerkschaft; Berufsrecht; soziale Ungleichheit; Einkommensverteilung; Erwerbseinkommen; Lohnentwicklung; Arbeitsrecht; USA; }, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 2285}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210910LQ5}, } ********************************** 4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER ********************************** @Book{Bechlioulis:2021:DEM, Author= {Alexandros Bechlioulis and Michael Chletsos}, Title= {The differentiated effects of minimum wage reforms on unemployment Evidence from the Greek labor market}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {27}, Address= {M{\"u}nchen}, Series= {MPRA paper}, Number= {109327}, Annote= {URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/109327.html}, Annote= {URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/109327.html}, Abstract= {"The paper studies the relative effect between two groups, a treatment group of low-wage workers and a control group of high-wage workers, when a minimum wage reform is introduced. The empirical analysis uses a rich dataset from the Greek labor market over the period between 2010 and 2020. The study examines whether the employees' responses and the potential effects of two different minimum wage reforms on unemployment were heterogenous. Our results are straightforward: among the two groups, the relative possibility of job loss is associated with an increase in the minimum wage, while the relative possibility of job search difficulty is strongly affected by a minimum wage cut. The former result is getting worse for employees who engaged in a minimum wage-intensive sector in the previous year and are now inactive. The latter result is reinforced for very young workers." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn; Reformpolitik; Auswirkungen; Beschäftigungseffekte; Arbeitslosigkeitsentwicklung; Lohnerhöhung; Lohnsenkung; Geringverdiener; Arbeitsmarktchancen; altersspezifische Faktoren; qualifikationsspezifische Faktoren; Griechenland; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2010-2020}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J23 ; C31 ; J21 ; J08}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210914LTY}, } 4 von 370 Datensätzen ausgegeben.