Suchprofil: Mindestlohn Durchsuchter Fertigstellungsmonat: 11/19 Sortierung: 1. SSCI-JOURNALS 2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN 3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN 4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER 5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR 6. BEITRÄGE ZU SAMMELWERKEN **************** 1. SSCI-JOURNALS **************** @Article{Arranz:2019:JQD, Journal= {Social science research}, Volume= {84}, Number= {vember}, Author= {José M. Arranz and Carlos García-Serrano and Virginia Hernanz}, Title= {Job quality differences among younger and older workers in Europe : The role of institutions}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {Art. 102345, 17}, ISBN= {ISSN 0049-089X}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsplatzqualität - internationaler Vergleich; altersspezifische Faktoren; junge Erwachsene; Jugendliche; ältere Arbeitnehmer; institutionelle Faktoren; Work-Life-Balance; Arbeitsbedingungen; Tarifverhandlungen; Mindestlohn; Kündigungsrecht; Berufsbildungssystem; Europa; Österreich; Belgien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Spanien; Finnland; Frankreich; Irland; Italien; Niederlande; Portugal; Schweden; Großbritannien; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2005; E 2015}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J21; J28; J81}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: X 269}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191107v23}, } @Article{Bonin:2019:GSM, Journal= {Jahrb{\"u}cher f{\"u}r National{\"o}konomie und Statistik}, Number= {online first}, Author= {Holger Bonin and Ingo E. Isphording and Annabelle Krause-Pilatus and Andreas Lichter and Nico Pestel and Ulf Rinne}, Title= {The German statutory minimum wage and its effects on regional employment and unemployment}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {25}, ISBN= {ISSN 0021-4027}, Abstract= {"This paper studies the effects of the introduction of Germany's statutory minimum wage in 2015 on employment and unemployment on the level of regional labor markets. Using variation in the regional exposure to the new wage floor, we employ a difference-in-differences approach that compares the evolution of employment and unemployment between regions with varying minimum wage bites. Overall, we find no statistically significant effect of the introduction of the German minimum wage on regular employment subject to social insurance, but a statistically significant negative effect on marginal employment. The reduction is not accompanied by a proportional increase in unemployment." (Author's abstract, © De Gruyter) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn - Auswirkungen; Beschäftigungseffekte; regionaler Arbeitsmarkt; Erwerbsquote; Arbeitslosenquote; geringfügige Beschäftigung; regionaler Vergleich; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2013; E 2016}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J21; J31; J38}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 488}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191107v12}, } @Article{Burauel:2019:IGM, Journal= {Jahrb{\"u}cher f{\"u}r National{\"o}konomie und Statistik}, Number= {online first}, Author= {Patrick Burauel and Marco Caliendo and Markus M. Grabka and Cosima Obst and Malte Preuss and Schr{\"o}der Carsten and Cortnie Shupe}, Title= {The impact of the German minimum wage on individual wages and monthly earnings}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {31}, ISBN= {ISSN 0021-4027}, Abstract= {"This paper evaluates the short-run impact of the introduction of a statutory minimum wage in Germany on the hourly wages and monthly earnings of workers targeted by the reform. We first provide detailed descriptive evidence of changes to the wage structure in particular at the bottom of the distribution and distinguish between trends for regularly employed and marginally employed workers. In the causal analysis, we then employ a differential trend adjusted difference-in-differences (DTADD) strategy to identify the extent to which these changes in wages and earnings can be attributed to the minimum wage introduction. We find that the minimum wage introduction can account for hourly wage growth in the order of roughly 6.5% or e0.45/hour and an increase in monthly earnings of 6.6%or e53/month. Despite finding wage growth at the bottom of the distribution, the paper documents widespread non-compliance with the mandated wage floor of e8.50/hour." (Author's abstract, © De Gruyter) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn - Auswirkungen; Einkommenseffekte; Lohnhöhe; Monatslohn; Lohnstruktur; Lohnunterschied; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2010; E 2016}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J31; J38; J22}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 488}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191107v14}, } @Article{Burauel:2019:IMW, Journal= {Jahrb{\"u}cher f{\"u}r National{\"o}konomie und Statistik}, Number= {online first}, Author= {Patrick Burauel and Marco Caliendo and Markus M. Grabka and Cosima Obst and Malte Preuss and Carsten Schr{\"o}der}, Title= {The impact of the minimum wage on working hours}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {35}, ISBN= {ISSN 0021-4027}, Abstract= {"The present paper analyzes how the statutory minimum wage introduced on January 1, 2015, has affected working hours in Germany up to 2016. The data used come from the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), which provides not only contractual working hours but also actual hours worked. Using a difference-in-differences estimation approach, we find a significant and robust reduction in contractual working hours among employees who are subject to social security contributions and earned less than the minimumwage before the introduction. The effect in 2015 is about -5% and corresponds to a 1.7 hours reduction in average weekly working hours. The effect on actual hours is smaller and estimated less precisely. Extending the analysis until 2016 does not yield significant effects on contractual or actual working hours, while some specifications reject the common trend assumption." (Author's abstract, © De Gruyter) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn - Auswirkungen; Arbeitszeitentwicklung; Wochenarbeitszeit; Arbeitszeitverkürzung; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2012; E 2016}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J23; J38; J81}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 488}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191107v11}, } @Article{Duetsch:2019:CCT, Journal= {Jahrb{\"u}cher f{\"u}r National{\"o}konomie und Statistik}, Number= {online first}, Author= {Matthias D{\"u}tsch and Ralf Himmelreicher}, Title= {Characteristics contributing to low- and minimum-wage labour in Germany}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {40}, ISBN= {ISSN 0021-4027}, Abstract= {"In this article we examine the correlation between characteristics of individuals, companies, and industries involved in low-wage labour in Germany and the risks workers face of earning hourly wages that are below the minimumwage or low-wage thresholds. To identify these characteristics, we use the Structure of Earnings Survey (SES) 2014. The SES is a mandatory survey of companies which provides information on wages and working hours from about 1 million jobs and nearly 70,000 companies from all industries. This data allows us to present the first systematic analysis of the interaction of individual-, company-, and industry-level factors on minimum- and low-wage working in Germany. Using a descriptive analysis, we first give an overview of typical lowpaying jobs, companies, and industries. Second, we use random intercept-only models to estimate the explanatory power of the individual, company, and industry levels. One main finding is that the influence of individual characteristics on wage levels is often overstated: Less than 25 % of the differences in the employment situation regarding being employed in minimum-wage or low-wage jobs can be attributed to the individual level. Third, we performed logistic and linear regression estimations to assess the risks of having a minimum- or lowwage job and the distance between a worker's actual earnings and the minimumor low-wage thresholds. Our findings allow us to conclude that several determinants related to individuals appear to suggest a high low-wage incidence, but in fact lose their explanatory power once controls are added for factors relating to the companies or industries that employ these individuals." (Author's abstract, © De Gruyter) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Niedriglohnbereich; Mindestlohn; sektorale Verteilung; Beschäftigtenzahl; Beschäftigtenstruktur; Unternehmensgröße; Qualifikationsstruktur; Geschlechterverteilung; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2014; E 2014}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J310; J830}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 488}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191107v10}, } ********************************** 4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER ********************************** @Book{Aitken:2019:IIN, Institution={National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Andrew Aitken and Peter Dolton and Rebecca Riley}, Title= {The impact of the introduction of the national living wage on employment, hours and wages}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {110}, Address= {London}, Series= {NIESR discussion paper}, Number= {501}, Annote= {URL: https://www.niesr.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publications/DP501.pdf}, Abstract= {"In 2015 the UK government announced the introduction of a new 'National Living Wage' (NLW) that would apply to those aged 25 and above from April 2016. At a rate of £7.20, this represented a significant increase of 7.5% over the existing National Minimum Wage (NMW) rate. Previous research has generally found, with some exceptions, that the NMW has raised the earnings of low paid workers, without significantly affecting their employment opportunities. The relatively large increase in the wage floor with the introduction of the NLW, and plans to raise the NLW to 60% of median earnings by 2020, raises the possibility of detrimental effects on employment retention and hours worked. We use a difference-in-differences approach and data from the Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings to examine the effects of the NLW introduction and April 2017 uprating on employment retention and hours worked. Overall we find that recent NLW upratings have increased wages for the low paid with generally little adverse effect on employment retention. However, consistent with previous research, we do find some evidence of adverse effects on the employment retention rates of women working part-time. We also find evidence of a reduction in employment retention for some of the lowest paid workers in the retail industries." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn - Auswirkungen; Beschäftigungseffekte; Einkommenseffekte; Arbeitszeitentwicklung; Geringverdiener; Niedriglohnbereich; Existenzminimum; Großbritannien; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2007; E 2017}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v04}, } @Book{deBeer:2017:IBM, Institution={Institute for Advanced Labour Studies, Amsterdam (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Paul de Beer and Wike Been and Wiemer Salverda}, Title= {The interplay between the minimum wage and collective bargaining in the Netherlands : An overview and a case study of three sectors}, Year= {2017}, Pages= {89}, Address= {Amsterdam}, Series= {AIAS working paper}, Number= {173}, ISBN= {ISSN 2213-4980}, Annote= {URL: https://aias.s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/website/uploads/1499168312532WP-173---de-Beer,-Been,-Salverda.pdf}, Abstract= {"This paper aims to provide a detailed picture in three parts of the statutory minimum wage in the Netherlands that provides a legally minimum level of pay which is binding for all sectors. First, we show how it was legally established in the 1960s and subsequently complemented with an extensive set of youth minimum wages, what the rules are that affect its uprating and how these are influenced by trade unions and employers' associations. We examine how the level and the employment incidence of the minimum wage have evolved since the 1960s to gauge its significance for the development and distribution of wage earnings, including the incidence of low pay. In addition we consider briefly its relationship to personal and household incomes. Secondly, we discuss how the minimum wage relates to collective labour agreements, many of which stipulate wage scales which start at a higher level than the minimum wage. Particular attention is paid to the gap between the lowest wage scales and the minimum wage, which has narrowed considerably since the 1990s under pressure from the government, and how this is reflected in the distribution of wages. Finally, we present the results of three industry-based case studies of the role played by the minimum wage, or not, in the daily practice of collective wage and employment bargaining regarding both the minimum wage itself and the lowest wage scales of collective agreements in three particular industries: metal manufacturing, cleaning and super markets. We end with a brief appraisal of the changes and the future role of the minimum wage." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn; Mindestlohnrecht; Lohnpolitik; Beschäftigungsentwicklung; sektorale Verteilung; Lohnhöhe; Tarifverhandlungen; Lohnfindung; Reinigungsberufe; Einzelhandel; Metallindustrie; Jugendliche; Lohnentwicklung; institutionelle Faktoren; junge Erwachsene; Niederlande; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1964; E 2016}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v30}, } @Book{Godøy:2019:MWE, Institution={University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Anna Godøy and Michael Reich}, Title= {Minimum wage effects in low-wage areas}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {48}, Address= {Berkeley, CA}, Series= {IRLE working paper}, Number= {2019-106}, Annote= {URL: https://irle.berkeley.edu/files/2019/07/Minimum-Wage-Effects-in-Low-Wage-Areas.pdf}, Abstract= {"A proposal to raise the federal minimum wage to $15 by 2024 would increase the relative minimum wage - the ratio to the national median wage - to about .68. In Alabama and Mississippi, our two lowest-wage states, the relative minimum wage would rise to .77 and .85, respectively. Yet research on state-level minimum wage policies does not extend beyond $10; the highest studied state-level relative minimum wage is .59. To close this gap we study minimum wage effects in counties and PUMAs where relative minimum wage ratios already reach as high as .82. Using ACS data since 2005 and 51 events, we sort counties and PUMAs according to their relative minimum wages and bites. We report average results for all the events in our sample, and separately for those with lower and higher impacts. We find positive wage effects but do not detect adverse effects on employment, weekly hours or annual weeks worked. We do not find negative employment effects among women, blacks and/or Hispanics. We do find substantial declines in household and child poverty." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn; Lohnerhöhung - Auswirkungen; Einkommenseffekte; Beschäftigungseffekte; Arbeitszeit; Niedriglohnbereich; regionaler Vergleich; Armut; USA; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2005; E 2017}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J20; J31; J48; J80}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v33}, } @Book{Godøy:2019:PLS, Institution={University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Anna Godøy and Michael Reich and Sylvia A. Allegretto}, Title= {Parental labor supply: Evidence from minimum wage changes}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {61}, Address= {Berkeley, CA}, Series= {IRLE working paper}, Number= {2019-103}, Annote= {URL: https://irle.berkeley.edu/files/2019/04/Parental-Labor-Supply-Evidence-from-Minimum-Wage-Changes.pdf}, Abstract= {"Declining labor force participation rates among less-educated individuals in theU.S. have been attributed to various causes, including skill-biased technical change,demand shocks induced by international competition, looser eligibility requirementsfor disability insurance, the opioid epidemic and the nature of child care and familyleave policies. In this paper, we examine how the labor supply of parents of dependentchildren respond to minimum wage changes. We implement an event study frameworkand document a sharp rise in employment and earnings of parents after state minimumwage increases. We further show that these effects are concentrated among jobs thatpay the minimum wage or slightly higher - high wage employment remains unaffected.Panel models find corresponding drops in welfare receipts, moreover, for single mothers,effects are larger for mothers of preschool age children. The results are consistentwith a simple labor supply model in which means-tested transfers and fixed costs ofwork in the form of paid childcare create barriers to labor market entry for parentsof dependent children. Minimum wage increases then enable higher rates of parentallabor force participation, resulting in significant reductions in child poverty. We findno evidence of employment crowd-out among non-parents, suggesting potential overallwelfare gains from higher minimum wages." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn; Lohnerhöhung - Auswirkungen; Arbeitskräfteangebot; Eltern; Erwerbsbeteiligung; Kinder; Armut; Einkommenseffekte; Beschäftigungseffekte; Ehepaare; allein Erziehende; Väter; Mütter; USA; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1980; E 2015}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v32}, } @Book{Heimberger:2019:ILM, Institution={Wiener Institut f{\"u}r Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Philipp Heimberger}, Title= {The impact of labour market institutions and capital accumulation on unemployment : Evidence for the OECD, 1985-2013}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {34}, Address= {Wien}, Series= {WIIW working paper}, Number= {164}, Annote= {URL: https://wiiw.ac.at/the-impact-of-labour-market-institutions-and-capital-accumulation-on-unemployment-evidence-for-the-oecd-1985-2013-dlp-4886.pdf}, Abstract= {"This paper provides econometric evidence on the impact of labour market regulations on ('structural') unemployment rates. Based on a data set for 23 OECD countries over the time period 1985-2013, the panel regression results suggest that standard institutional labour market indicators - such as employment protection legislation, trade union density, tax wedge, minimum wages - largely underperform in explaining (medium-term) unemployment, while cyclical macroeconomic factors - in particular capital accumulation, but also the long-term real interest rate - are essential determinants. These results underscore that the existing macroeconometric evidence in favour of the view that labour market rigidities are at the heart of increased 'structural' unemployment in advanced economies is modest at best. Some labour market variables do have an impact on unemployment, but it is in general smaller than the impact of relevant macroeconomic variables. To understand the development of unemployment in OECD countries, researchers and policy-makers therefore should consider aggregate demand dynamics and focus on capital accumulation." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsmarktpolitik; Regulierung - Auswirkungen; Arbeitslosenquote - internationaler Vergleich; Kündigungsschutz; Tarifverhandlungen; Mindestlohn; Steuerpolitik; ökonomische Faktoren; Kapitalakkumulation; Zins; strukturelle Arbeitslosigkeit; Nachfrageentwicklung; NAIRU; OECD; Australien; Österreich; Belgien; Tschechische Republik; Kanada; Dänemark; Finnland; Frankreich; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Ungarn; Irland; Italien; Japan; Luxemburg; Niederlande; Neuseeland; Norwegen; Portugal; Spanien; Schweden; Schweiz; Großbritannien; USA; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1985; E 2013}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: C54; E24; E62}, Annote= {Sprache: de}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191114r03}, } @Book{Herzog-Stein:2019:SME, Institution={Institut f{\"u}r Makro{\"o}konomie und Konjunkturforschung (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Herzog-Stein and Camille Logeay}, Title= {Short-term macroeconomic evaluation of the German minimum wage with a VAR/VECM}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {40}, Address= {D{\"u}sseldorf}, Series= {IMK working paper}, Number= {197}, ISBN= {ISSN 1861-2199}, Annote= {URL: https://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_imk_wp_197_2019.pdf}, Abstract= {"The German minimum wage was introduced in January 2015. This paper investigates the short-term macroeconomic impacts of its introduction. Therefore, an estimated VAR/VECM is used to perform forecasts that are interpreted as counterfactual to the introduction of the minimum wage and compared to actual developments of six key macroeconomic variables. The deviations are interpreted as minimum wage effects. Robustness checks as well as a comparison with descriptive empirical results are performed to assess the validity of the results. Overall, small positive price effects, significant positive wage effects, and positive employment effects although not robust-ly estimated in their magnitude are found." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn - Auswirkungen; Makroökonomie; Preisniveau; Einkommenseffekte; Beschäftigungseffekte; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1991; E 2017}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: E65; E24; E17; E01}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191030v18}, } @Book{Lordan:2019:PVM, Institution={Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Grace Lordan}, Title= {People versus machines in the UK: Minimum wages, labor reallocation and automatable jobs}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {33}, Address= {Bonn}, Series= {IZA discussion paper}, Number= {12716}, ISBN= {ISSN 2365-9793}, Annote= {URL: http://doku.iab.de/externe/2019/k191115v08.pdf}, Abstract= {"This study follows the Lordan and Neumark (2018) analysis for the US, and examines whether minimum wage increases affect employment opportunities in automatable jobs in the UK for low-skilled low-wage workers. Overall, I find that increasing the minimum wage decreases the share of automatable employment held by low-skilled low-wage workers, and increases the likelihood that workers in automatable jobs become disemployed. On aggregate the effect size is modest, but I also provide evidence that these effects are larger in more recent years. The study also highlights significant heterogeneity by industry and demographic group, including more substantive adverse effects for older low-skilled workers in manufacturing, as well as effects at the intensive margin." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: technischer Wandel - Auswirkungen; Beschäftigungseffekte; Automatisierung; Berufsgruppe; Mindestlohn; Lohnerhöhung - Auswirkungen; Geringverdiener; Niedrigqualifizierte; Entlassungen; Tätigkeitsmerkmale; Substitutionspotenzial; Großbritannien; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1994; E 2017}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J23; J38}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191115v08}, } @Book{Matano:2019:IAM, Institution={Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Alessia Matano and Paolo Naticchioni and Francesco Vona}, Title= {The institutional adjustment margin to import competition : evidence from Italian minimum wages}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {27}, Address= {Bonn}, Series= {IZA discussion paper}, Number= {12714}, ISBN= {ISSN 2365-9793}, Annote= {URL: http://doku.iab.de/externe/2019/k191115v06.pdf}, Abstract= {"A growing body of research has contributed to understanding the labor market and political effects of globalization. This paper explores an overlooked aspect of trade-induced adjustments in the labor market: the institutional aspect. We take advantage of the twotier collective bargaining structure of the Italian labor market, whereby the first tier entails setting minimum wages at the contract level. Using an instrumental variable strategy and exploiting variations in contract-level exposure to trade, we find for the 1995-2003 period that, on average, the surge in imports decreased contractual minimum wages by 1.5%. This impact increases in the share of unskilled workers employed in the contract. This negative institutional effect contrasts with a nonsignificant effect of trade on total wages, with the latter becoming positive and large only for highly skilled workers." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Globalisierung - Auswirkungen; Beschäftigungseffekte; Außenhandel; institutionelle Faktoren; Tarifverhandlungen; Mindestlohn; Import; Einkommenseffekte; Geringverdiener; Beschäftigtenstruktur; Qualifikationsstruktur; qualifikationsspezifische Faktoren; internationaler Wettbewerb; Italien; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1995; E 2003}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J50; F16; J31; J24}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191115v06}, } @Book{Nadler:2019:ALM, Institution={University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Carl Nadler and Sylvia A. Allegretto and Anna Godøy and Michael Reich}, Title= {Are local minimum wages too high?}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {109}, Address= {Berkeley, CA}, Series= {IRLE working paper}, Number= {2019-102}, Annote= {URL: https://irle.berkeley.edu/files/2019/04/Are-Local-Minimum-Wages-Too-High.pdf}, Abstract= {"We measure the effects of six citywide minimum wages that ranged up to $13 in Chicago, the District of Columbia, Oakland, San Francisco, San Jose and Seattle, employing event study and synthetic control methods. Using aggregate data on average earnings and employment in the food services industry, we find significantly positive earnings increases and no significant employment losses. While such evidence suggests the policies raised the earnings of low-wage workers, as intended, a competing explanation is that the industry responds to wage increases by increasing their demand for more productive higher-wage workers, offsetting low-wage layoffs (i.e., labor-labor substitution). To tackle this key question, we present a theoretical framework that connects the responses estimated at the industry-level to the own- and cross-wage labor demand elasticities that summarize the total effect of the policies on workers. Using a calibration exercise, we find that the combination of average earnings gains and constant employment cannot be produced by labor-labor substitution unless there are also effects on hours. To test whether the minimum wage increases demand for higher-wage workers or reduces low-wage workers' hours, we examine the effects of California's recent state and local minimum wage policies on the food services industry. There we find no evidence of labor-labor substitution or hours responses. Thus, the most likely explanation for the responses we find in the cities is that the industry's demand for low-wage workers is inelastic, and the policies raised their earnings." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn - Auswirkungen; Beschäftigungseffekte; Nahrungs- und Genussmittelgewerbe; regionaler Vergleich; Stadt; Geringverdiener; Arbeitszeit; Substitutionseffekte; Arbeitskräftenachfrage; Einkommenseffekte; USA; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2009; E 2016}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v31}, } @Book{Schuetz:2018:CPP, Institution={Institut f{\"u}r Volkswirtschaftslehre, Linz (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Bernhard Sch{\"u}tz}, Title= {Creating a pluralist paradigm: An application to the minimum wage debate}, Year= {2018}, Pages= {39}, Address= {Linz}, Series= {Institut f{\"u}r Volkswirtschaftslehre Linz. Arbeitspapier}, Number= {1807}, Annote= {URL: http://www.economics.uni-linz.ac.at/papers/2018/wp1807.pdf}, Abstract= {"The paper offers a pluralist route along which different theoretical approaches can be integrated into a common framework. It proposes to use causal mapping and combine it with a micro-meso-macro architecture to get well-structured descriptions of different economic theories and to provide a good foundation for integrating these theories. In order to illustrate this point and to shed some new light on a contested economic issue, the paper applies this strategy to the minimum wage debate. It follows from the analysis that from a theoretical viewpoint, the effect of the minimum wage on employment is indeed ambiguous, which is perfectly in line with the existing empirical evidence." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Pluralismus; ökonomische Theorie; Mindestlohn; Mindestlohnrecht; Neoklassik; Arbeitsmarkttheorie; Monopson; Lohntheorie; Unternehmenstheorie; Institutionalismus; Keynesianismus; Beschäftigungseffekte; }, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: B52; E12; J30; J42}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v34}, } @Book{Tijdens:2017:IAR, Institution={Institute for Advanced Labour Studies, Amsterdam (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Kea G. Tijdens}, Title= {Institutional arrangements regarding minimum wage setting in 195 countries}, Year= {2017}, Pages= {44}, Address= {Amsterdam}, Series= {AIAS working paper}, Number= {170}, ISBN= {ISSN 2213-4980}, Annote= {URL: https://aias.s3-eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/website/uploads/1487757950056WP-170---Tijdens.pdf}, Abstract= {"ILO Conventions C026 and C131 challenge countries to implement minimum wage-fixing mechanisms. How many countries do have a statutory minimum wage ((S)MW)? How many apply differentiated MWs? How many set MW by Collective Bargaining (CB)? And how many do not have either of these? This paper adresses these four questions. On this behalf we merged 12 databases with information about MW fixing mechanisms and their coverage (Eurofound, ICTWSS, five ILO databases, MACHequity, three WageIndicator databases, WorldBank). They vary regarding years and countries covered and characteristics coded. Europea and Latin America were best represented, co Oceania least. The merged database includes information about 195 countries for five years (2011 - 2015). Clearly, the absence of a single institution responsible for collecting MW policies and rates impedes producing adequate wordwide overviews. Against this backdrop we present and discuss outcomes of our inventory. Based on the harmonised database (97 countries with data covering all five years) we found that between 2011 and 2015 the percentage of countries with a SMW policy increased from 92% to 94%. According to the merged database (all 195 countries) between 75% and 93% of these countries applied a MW-fixing mechanism in at least one year. If a differentiated MW is defined as covering part of the dependent labour force only data is available for OECD countries and some others, indicating that 15% of the 48 countries at stake applied a partial minimum wage. If a differentiated MW is defined as covering the entire dependent labour force though with varying rates, a database of 76 countries with a SMW allowed to conclude that 53% applied differentiated MWs. Most breakdowns were by industry, followed by geographical areas and occupation. We found that countries with multiple MWs tend to mimic CB outcomes. Using the merged database we found that less than 3% of developing countries applied MW fixing through CB. Across Europe this share was considerably higher but decreasing. We detailed the underlying changes. Finally, we studied which countries recently did not have a MW; this was the case (over at least three years) for 16 countries." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn - internationaler Vergleich; institutionelle Faktoren; Lohnfindung; Lohnpolitik; Lohnhöhe; ILO-Richtlinie; Tarifverhandlungen; Politikumsetzung; Rechtsanspruch; Welt; Afrika; Asien; Europa; Nordamerika; Südamerika; Ozeanien; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2011; E 2015}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v29}, } @Book{Yuen:2019:MWI, Institution={National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (Hrsg.)}, Author= {C. Y. Kelvin Yuen and Ping Wang}, Title= {Minimum wage in a Multi-Tier search and wage-posting model with cross-market substitutions}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {57}, Address= {Cambrige, Mass.}, Series= {NBER working paper}, Number= {26378}, Abstract= {"While minimum wage policy is widely adopted in the real world, can it effectively raise the average wage of lower paid jobs without having large detrimental consequences for employment? The empirical literature fails to establish robust findings. We develop a general-equilibrium search and wage-posting framework with heterogeneous workers and tasks matching in multi-tier labor markets: abstract, routine high-skilled, routine middle-skilled, manual middle-skilled and manual low-skilled. We incorporate rich cross-market spillovers and compositional effects from individual responses to market thickness. As a result of minimum wage hikes, we show that (i) the unemployment rate at the minimum wage binding market is higher, while all other markets enjoy a lower unemployment rate; (ii) employment in the manual low-skilled jobs is lower, whereas employment in the routine high-skilled and manual middle-skilled markets is higher due to cross-market substitutions; and, (iii) employment in other markets has ambiguous responses due to conflicting effects on potential worker entry and unemployment. By calibrating the model to fit the U.S. data, we evaluate the impacts of the federal minimum wage hike (2007-2009) and the on-going minimum wage increase in Seattle (2017-2021). We find that the minimum wage effects on employment on the binding markets depend crucially on the magnitudes of spillover and compositional effects and that the employment effects may be weak in a nonbinding market. Moreover, our results suggest that, while both minimum wage hikes reduce aggregate output, they only generate small effects on submarket average and overall average wages." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn; Lohnpolitik; Einkommenseffekte; Geringverdiener; Beschäftigungseffekte; Substitutionseffekte; Niedriglohnbereich; qualifikationsspezifische Faktoren; USA; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2003; E 2017}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: D83; E24; E60; J64}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191028v14}, } *************************** 5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR *************************** @Book{Bosch:2019:KVM, Annote= {Sign.: vs.0745;}, Author= {Gerhard Bosch and Frederic H{\"u}ttenhoff and Claudia Weinkopf}, Title= {Kontrolle von Mindestl{\"o}hnen}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {311}, Address= {Wiesbaden}, Publisher= {Springer VS}, ISBN= {ISBN 978-3-658-26806-0}, Abstract= {"Im Buch werden die Ergebnisse der ersten umfassenden empirischen Untersuchung zur Kontrolle von Mindestlöhnen in Deutschland präsentiert. Es bietet am Beispiel von drei Branchen (Bauhauptgewerbe, Fleischwirtschaft, Gastgewerbe) einen Überblick zu Herausforderungen und Problemen bei der Durchsetzung (Enforcement) und Einhaltung (Compliance) von Mindestlöhnen. Auf der Basis zahlreicher Interviews mit Expertinnen und Experten aus der Praxis (z. B. Gewerkschaften, Arbeitgeberverbände, Zoll) und einer umfassenden Auswertung der breiten internationalen Forschungsliteratur werden Ansatzpunkte und Strategien aufgezeigt, um die Einhaltung und Durchsetzung von Mindestlöhnen nachhaltig zu verbessern. Inhalt: Der Inhalt: - Wirkungen des gesetzlichen Mindestlohns - Wechselwirkungen zwischen Mindest- und Tariflöhnen - Internationale Befunde zur Durchsetzung von Arbeitsstandards - Kontrolle von Mindestlöhnen in Deutschland - Das Bauhauptgewerbe - Fleischwirtschaft - Hotel- und Gaststättengewerbe - Strategische Ansatzpunkte für effektivere Kontrollen" (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn; Beschäftigungseffekte; Einkommenseffekte; Tariflohn; Politikumsetzung; Geringverdiener; Arbeitsrecht; Regulierung; Schwarzarbeit; Sanktion; Überwachung; Baugewerbe; Fleischverarbeiter; Gastgewerbe; Gewerkschaftspolitik; Tarifpolitik; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; }, Annote= {Sprache: de}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: vs.0745}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k190624801}, } @Book{European:2019:MWI, Institution={European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Hrsg.)}, Title= {Minimum wages in 2019: Annual review}, Year= {2019}, Pages= {49}, Address= {Dublin}, Series= {Eurofound research report}, ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-897-1881-3}, Abstract= {"In most EU Member States, reviews of the statutory minimum wage rates spark a great deal of public interest. Such reviews affect the wider workforce, beyond those workers on the statutory minimum wage. Pay rates in collective agreements may be adapted in response to an increase in the minimum wage, affecting lower-paid workers more generally; social benefits may also be affected, making the impact of such revisions even more widespread. This report covers developments in statutory minimum wages in 2018 - 2019 in the EU and Norway. It looks at the level of minimum wages, how they were set and how they have developed over time in nominal and real terms. It also covers major debates in relation to setting minimum wage levels. While the report focuses on the net remuneration of those receiving the minimum wage, it also documents minimum rates from selected collective agreements in countries without statutory minimum wages as well as minimum wage coverage rates of workers by gender." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn - internationaler Vergleich; Lohnhöhe; Lohnentwicklung; Kaufkraft; Lohnpolitik; Tarifverhandlungen; Geringverdiener; Beschäftigungsentwicklung; Europäisches Haushaltspanel; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; Norwegen; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2010; E 2019}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191030v26}, } 19 von 467 Datensätzen ausgegeben.