Suchprofil: Gender_wage_gap Durchsuchter Fertigstellungsmonat: 09/15 Sortierung: 1. SSCI-JOURNALS 2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN 3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN 4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER 5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR 6. BEITRÄGE ZU SAMMELWERKEN **************** 1. SSCI-JOURNALS **************** @Article{Janssen:2015:DSA, Journal= {ILR Review}, Number= {Online First}, Author= {Simon Janssen and Simone N. Tuor Sartore and Uschi Backes-Gellner}, Title= {Discriminatory social attitudes and varying gender pay gaps within firms}, Year= {2015}, Pages= {27}, ISBN= {ISSN 0019-7939}, Abstract= {"This study analyzes the relationship between discriminatory social attitudes toward gender equality and firms' pay-setting behavior by combining information about regional votes on constitutional amendments on equal rights for women and men with a large data set of multi-establishment firms and workers. The results show a strong relationship between discriminatory social attitudes toward gender equality and gender pay gaps within firms across regions. The results remain robust, even when the authors account for detailed worker and job characteristics and for regional sorting of firms. Overall, the results suggest that gender pay gaps are larger in regions where more people oppose gender equality rights. In other words, in the same firm women earn lower wages than their male coworkers in regions where more people have discriminatory social attitudes toward gender equality." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Gleichstellung; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; soziale Einstellungen - Auswirkungen; Lohnunterschied; Lohndiskriminierung; erwerbstätige Frauen; erwerbstätige Männer; Beschäftigerverhalten; regionale Faktoren; regionale Disparität; regionaler Vergleich; Schweiz; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1981; E 1998}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J31; J33; J71; M5}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 680}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k150331302}, } @Article{Livermore:2015:EAE, Journal= {Journal of Disability Policy Studies}, Volume= {26}, Number= {2}, Author= {Gina A. Livermore and Todd C. Honeycutt}, Title= {Employment and economic well-being of people with and without disabilities before and after the great recession}, Year= {2015}, Pages= {70-79}, ISBN= {ISSN 1538-4802; ISSN 1044-2073;}, Abstract= {"The latest U.S. economic recession, commonly referred to as the Great Recession, has had a far-reaching impact, but its effects may be disproportionately experienced by working-age people with disabilities, given their already tenuous attachment to the labor force. We used data from the Current Population Survey both to describe the experiences of working-age people with disabilities during 2006 - 2012 (a period beginning before and ending after the Great Recession) and to compare the experiences of this population with those of working-age people without disabilities. We found few significant differences in the characteristics of people with disabilities before and after the Great Recession. The employment rate of people with disabilities was low both before and after the recession, though the decline in employment among people with disabilities was somewhat greater than for people without disabilities. The employment declines observed during this period for people with disabilities reflect a long-term downward trend that has persisted for decades, raising concerns that people with disabilities are permanently exiting the labor force. Job loss after the recession was particularly concentrated among people with disabilities in blue-collar and goods-producing jobs. People with and without disabilities experienced similar increases in poverty. Ongoing surveillance of the characteristics and employment of people with disabilities is needed to identify trends and develop policies to promote their independence and economic security." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Behinderte; berufliche Integration; Lohnunterschied; Erwerbsquote; Rezession; Hispanier; Farbige; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; altersspezifische Faktoren; Bildungsniveau; Ehefrauen; Ehemänner; Weiße; Erwerbsbeteiligung; offene Stellen; USA; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2006; E 2012}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 2094}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k150817920}, } @Article{Magnusson:2015:GWG, Journal= {Work, employment and society}, Number= {Online First}, Author= {Charlotta Magnusson}, Title= {The gender wage gap in highly prestigious occupations : a case study of Swedish medical doctors}, Year= {2015}, Pages= {19}, ISBN= {ISSN 0950-0170}, Abstract= {"The gender wage gap within a highly prestigious occupation, the medical profession, is investigated both longitudinally and cross-sectionally using Swedish administrative data. This is done by investigating: to what extent the gender wage gap among physicians varies between fields of medicine (within-occupation segregation) and across family status; whether there is an association between parenthood and wages among physicians and, if so, whether there is a gender difference in this association; and changes in the gender wage gap among physicians over time. The results indicate a large overall gender wage difference for medical doctors. Even when gender differences in specialization are taken into account, men have higher wages than women do. For both men and women physicians, there is a positive association between parenthood and wages. The longitudinal analyses show that the gender wage gap among physicians was greater in 2007 than in 1975. Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI), Stockholm University The gender wage gap in highly prestigious occupations * a case study of Swedish medical doctors Online First doi: 10.1177/0950017015590760 2015-08-24 The gender wage gap within a highly prestigious occupation, the medical profession, is investigated both longitudinally and cross-sectionally using Swedish administrative data. This is done by investigating: to what extent the gender wage gap among physicians varies between fields of medicine (within-occupation segregation) and across family status; whether there is an association between parenthood and wages among physicians and, if so, whether there is a gender difference in this association; and changes in the gender wage gap among physicians over time. The results indicate a large overall gender wage difference for medical doctors. Even when gender differences in specialization are taken into account, men have higher wages than women do. For both men and women physicians, there is a positive association between parenthood and wages. The longitudinal analyses show that the gender wage gap among physicians was greater in 2007 than in 1975." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arzt; Lohnunterschied; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; erwerbstätige Frauen; erwerbstätige Männer; Lohnentwicklung; Berufsprestige; Familienstand; Schweden; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1975; E 2007}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 917}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k150825801}, } @Article{Permanyer:2015:WCI, Journal= {Journal of European Social Policy}, Volume= {25}, Number= {4}, Author= {Iñaki Permanyer}, Title= {Why call it 'equality' when it should be 'achievement'? : a proposal to un-correct the 'corrected gender gaps' in the EU Gender Equality Index}, Year= {2015}, Pages= {393-413}, ISBN= {ISSN 0958-9287}, Abstract= {"This study critically reviews the new Gender Equality Index (GEI) proposed by the European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) in 2013, arguing that the way in which it has been defined can be misleading for its potential users. The GEI is defined to ensure that good scores in the index are reflective of both low gender gaps and high levels of overall achievement. The study finds that the GEI values are largely driven by differences in overall achievement levels between countries rather than by gender differences within them, a disturbing issue that unduly penalizes low-income countries for factors that are not related to gender norms or discriminatory practices and which might lead to the elaboration of ill-targeted policies. In order to overcome this problem, we introduce a new version of the GEI that gets rid of its achievement component and which is much simpler to interpret." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Gleichstellung - Indikatoren; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Indikatorenbildung; Frauen; Männer; Gleichstellungspolitik - Erfolgskontrolle; Ungleichheit - Messung; Gleichstellung - Messung; Lohnunterschied; Gleichstellung - internationaler Vergleich; Europäische Union; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2013; E 2013}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 1342}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k150915801}, } @Article{Sevak:2015:ICA, Journal= {Journal of Disability Policy Studies}, Volume= {26}, Number= {2}, Author= {Purvi Sevak and Andrew J. Houtenville and Debra L. Brucker and John O'Neill}, Title= {Individual characteristics and the disability employment gap}, Year= {2015}, Pages= {80-88}, ISBN= {ISSN 1538-4802; ISSN 1044-2073;}, Abstract= {"Although people with disabilities have poorer employment outcomes, on average, than do people without disabilities, some of them fare relatively well in the labor market. To learn more about the individual characteristics associated with positive employment outcomes among people with disabilities, we use data from the 2009 - 2011 American Community Survey to examine differences in employment outcomes by demographic and other individual characteristics in a multivariable framework. Controlling for all other individual characteristics, we find the employment gap between individuals with and without disabilities is smaller among those in their 20s and 60s relative to the middle aged, Asians relative to Whites, Hispanics relative to non-Hispanics, married individuals, individuals with higher levels of educational attainment, and women. Overall, results suggest that policies and practices designed to improve employment outcomes among people with disabilities should consider how individual characteristics interact with disability as challenges to or facilitators of employment success." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Behinderte; berufliche Integration; Erwerbsbeteiligung; altersspezifische Faktoren; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; ethnische Gruppe; Lohnunterschied; Asiate; Hispanier; Ehefrauen; Ehemänner; qualifikationsspezifische Faktoren; Erwerbsquote; USA; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2009; E 2011}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 2094}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k150817921}, } ************************************ 2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN ************************************ @Article{Piazzalunga:2015:ITD, Journal= {Labour}, Volume= {29}, Number= {3}, Author= {Daniela Piazzalunga}, Title= {Is there a double-negative effect? Gender and ethnic wage differentials in Italy}, Year= {2015}, Pages= {243-269}, ISBN= {ISSN 1121-7081}, Abstract= {"This paper investigates the gender and ethnic wage differentials for female migrants in Italy by applying the Oaxaca - Blinder decomposition, with and without Heckman correction, to account for self-selection into the labour market. The gender wage gap is nearly 15 per cent, more than 60 per cent of which is unexplained by observable differences. The ethnic wage gap is much larger (39 per cent), but endowments explain 53 per cent of the gap. We also estimate the double-negative effect of being both female and a migrant. A female migrant earns 42 per cent less than an Italian male; the unexplained component is estimated to be 53 - 65 per cent. Results are robust to different specifications." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Einwanderer; ausländische Arbeitnehmer; ausländische Frauen; Lohnunterschied; Lohndiskriminierung; ethnische Gruppe; Minderheiten; erwerbstätige Männer; ausländische Männer; Inländer; Italiener; erwerbstätige Frauen; Italien; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2009; E 2009}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J16; J31; J61; J71}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 930}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k150902921}, } ********************************** 4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER ********************************** @Book{Guenalp:2015:MLM, Institution={Institut f{\"u}r Weltwirtschaft, Kiel (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Burak G{\"u}nalp and Seyit M{\"u}min Cilasun and Elif {\"O}znur Acar}, Title= {Male-female labor market participation and the extent of gender-based wage discrimination in Turkey}, Year= {2015}, Pages= {30}, Address= {Kiel}, Series= {Economics discussion papers}, Number= {2015-56}, Annote= {URL: http://doku.iab.de/externe/2015/k150901r07.pdf}, Abstract= {"A gender differential in wages is considered to be discriminatory if the differential cannot be explained by gender differences in productivity. Numerous studies have been performed to measure the extent of gender wage discrimination in countries across the world, and most report a substantial amount of wage differential after adjusting for productivity differences. This differential has been attributed to labor market discrimination against women. Using data from 2003 and 2010 Household Budget Surveys conducted by Turkish Statistical Institute, this study examines the male-female earnings differentials and measures the extent of pay discrimination in Turkey. To analyze the components of the earnings gap, two methodologies are employed: The standard Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition method and the Juhn-Murphy-Pierce decomposition method. The results of the study indicate that in both years, a significant portion of the observed wage differential is attributable to wage discrimination which records a rise over the period." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Lohndiskriminierung; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Lohnunterschied; Männer; Frauen; Erwerbsbeteiligung; Türkei; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2003; E 2010}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J16; J31; J70; J71; O15}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k150901r07}, } @Book{Rinawi:2015:SPS, Institution={Institut f{\"u}r Strategie und Unternehmens{\"o}konomik, Z{\"u}rich (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Miriam Rinawi and Uschi Backes-Gellner}, Title= {Skill prices, skill composition, and the structure of wages}, Year= {2015}, Pages= {42}, Address= {Z{\"u}rich}, Series= {Leading House working paper}, Number= {112}, Annote= {URL: http://repec.business.uzh.ch/RePEc/iso/leadinghouse/0112_lhwpaper.pdf}, Abstract= {"In the discussion on the impact of technology on wages, the impact of changes in skills remains under-investigated. Using RIF regression-based decompositions, we find that changes in the skill composition decrease wage inequality, whereas changing skill prices largely increase wage inequality. Both changes account for about one third of the changes of the wage distribution." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Bildungsertrag; Vollzeitarbeit; erwerbstätige Frauen; erwerbstätige Männer; Ausbildungskosten; Qualifikation; qualifikationsspezifische Faktoren; Lohnunterschied; Ungleichheit; Qualifikationsanforderungen; Dequalifizierung; Qualifikationsentwicklung; Berufswandel; Berufsstrukturwandel; Qualifikationswandel; Integrierte Arbeitsmarktbiografien; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Westdeutschland; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1978; E 2006}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J00; J31; J40}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k150904r11}, } *************************** 5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR *************************** @Book{Steffens:2015:GAW, Annote= {Sign.: 96-23.0272;}, Author= {Melanie C. Steffens and Ma. Àngels Viladot}, Title= {Gender at work : a social psychological perspective}, Year= {2015}, Pages= {312}, Address= {New York}, Publisher= {Lang}, Series= {Language as social action}, Number= {18}, ISBN= {ISBN 978-1-4331-2203-3}, Abstract= {"While many women receive equal education, such equality is nowhere in sight when it comes to women's and men's career success: men still earn significantly more than women and are more likely to be promoted. In this book, the authors offer a state of the art review of applied social-psychological research on gender at work, shedding light on all the different ways that work-related perceptions, attributions, outcomes, and the like differ for women and men. Focusing on domains (e.g., engineering) and positions (e.g., leadership) that are marked by women's underrepresentation, the first part of the book looks at gender at work in terms of stereotypes, attitudes, and social roles, including parenthood, while the second part takes a social identity and communication perspective, exploring the situations in which men and women interact at work. Many chapters focus on applied questions, such as career choice, effects of role models, and sexual harassment at work. Theories and findings are applied to these topics, with conclusions and recommendations drawn throughout the book." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Frauen; Diskriminierung; psychische Faktoren; Stereotyp; Geschlechterrolle; soziale Identität; Interaktion; Mitarbeiter; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Berufswahl; Führungskräfte; Geschlechterverteilung; sexuelle Belästigung; Unternehmenskultur; Lohnunterschied; Lohndiskriminierung; Vorurteil; Rollenverhalten; soziale Rolle; MINT-Berufe; USA; Europa; }, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: 96-23.0272}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k150805803}, } 9 von 361 Datensätzen ausgegeben.