Suchprofil: Gender_wage_gap Durchsuchter Fertigstellungsmonat: 10/14 Sortierung: 1. SSCI-JOURNALS 2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN 3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN 4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER 5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR 6. BEITRÄGE ZU SAMMELWERKEN **************** 1. SSCI-JOURNALS **************** @Article{Ochsenfeld:2014:WDW, Journal= {European Sociological Review}, Volume= {30}, Number= {4}, Author= {Fabian Ochsenfeld}, Title= {Why do women's fields of study pay less? : a test of devaluation, human capital, and gender role theory}, Year= {2014}, Pages= {536-548}, ISBN= {ISSN 0266-7215}, Abstract= {"As men are overrepresented in lucrative fields and women disproportionately graduate from disciplines that yield low wages in the labour market, horizontal sex segregation in higher education contributes significantly to economic gender inequality. However, what underlies the association between sex composition and wages in fields of study? We draw on data from the German HIS Graduate Panel Study 1997 (N = 4,092) and use hierarchical linear models to adjudicate between devaluation theory and explanations based on differential sorting processes: human capital and gender role theory. The resulting evidence for both human capital and devaluation theory is scant. Consistent with gender role theory, differences in the attractiveness of fields to students with a careerist approach to higher education and the labour market in turn explain most of the association between field of studies' sex composition and wage levels. We therefore conclude that gendered patterns of self-selection that derive from men's socialization into the breadwinner role rather than valuative discrimination or rational anticipation of career interruptions underlie the association between fields' sex composition and wage levels." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Frauenberufe; Studienfach; Studienfachwahl; Bildungsertrag; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Lohnunterschied; erwerbstätige Frauen; erwerbstätige Männer; Hochschulabsolventen; Männerberufe; Geschlechterrolle; Rollentheorie; Humankapitalansatz; Geschlechterverteilung; Arbeitswerttheorie; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1997; E 2002}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 863}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k141006v13}, } ************************* 3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN ************************* @Article{Belser:2012:AWL, Journal= {Labour education}, Volume= {4}, Number= {1}, Author= {Patrick Belser and Kristen Sobeck}, Title= {At what level should countries set their minimum wages?}, Year= {2012}, Pages= {105-127}, ISBN= {ISSN 0378-5467}, Annote= {URL: http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_dialogue/---actrav/documents/publication/wcms_183568.pdf}, Abstract= {"This paper has reviewed some fundamental elements of minimum wage setting and proposed a discussion on some of the indicators which can be used to set a first-time minimum wage or to evaluate whether an existing legal floor is set at the 'right' level. The use of such indicators is a practical way to choose a minimum wage rate that brings real benefits to low-paid workers, while at the same time remaining consistent with the objectives of a competitive economy. Once these indicators are calculated, it is of course up to the governments, and the social partners, to define their respective positions with a view to convincing a majority of those who hold the final decision-making power. But by using these indicators, decision-makers at least have some basic information" (Text excerpt, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn - internationaler Vergleich; Lohnpolitik; Lohnhöhe; Lohnfindung; politischer Entscheidungsprozess; Sozialpartner; sozialer Dialog; Einkommenseffekte; erwerbstätige Frauen; Lohnunterschied; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Politikumsetzung; Beschäftigungseffekte; Lohnstruktur; ILO; Welt; }, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 849}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k140929v02}, } ********************************** 4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER ********************************** @Book{Duvivier:2014:MWP, Institution={Centre d'Etudes de l'Emploi, Noisy-le-Grand (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Chloé Duvivier and Mathieu Narcy}, Title= {The motherhood wage penalty and its determinants : a public-private comparison}, Year= {2014}, Pages= {34}, Address= {Noisy-le-Grand}, Series= {Centre d'Etudes de l'Emploi. Document de travail}, Number= {172}, ISBN= {ISBN 978-2-11-129847-7; ISSN 1629-7997}, Annote= {URL: http://www.cee-recherche.fr/sites/default/files/webfm/publications/docdetravail/172-motherhood-wage-penalty-public-private-comparison.pdf}, Abstract= {"In this paper, we investigate whether public and private sector employees bear a different wage penalty from having children. Using data from the Families and Employers survey, we are able to address three potential biases: self-selection into employment, self-selection into sectors, and unobserved heterogeneity. We find that mothers of two or more children suffer from a much larger penalty when they work in the private sector. In addition, in both sectors, we find no unexplained penalty once we control for all the potential determinants of the family pay gap, namely, a reduced labour supply of mothers, child-related career interruptions, less access to management positions, and adjustments in working conditions. However, these factors play different roles in explaining the motherhood penalty in each sector; most notably, child-related career interruptions are much more harmful in the private sector than in the public sector." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: erwerbstätige Frauen; Mütter; Elternschaft; Kinder - Auswirkungen; Lohnhöhe; privater Sektor; staatlicher Sektor; Beruf und Familie; Familienstand; Kinderzahl; Lohndiskriminierung; Erwerbsunterbrechung; Berufsrückkehrerinnen; Frankreich; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2004; E 2005}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J13; J31; L33}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k140917r01}, } @Book{Jacobsen:2014:CIM, Institution={Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Bonn (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Joyce Jacobsen and Melanie Khamis and Mutlu Yuksel}, Title= {Convergences in men's and women's life patterns : lifetime work, lifetime earnings, and human capital investment}, Year= {2014}, Pages= {40}, Address= {Bonn}, Series= {IZA discussion paper}, Number= {8425}, Annote= {URL: http://doku.iab.de/externe/2014/k140918r18.pdf}, Abstract= {"The changes in women and men's work lives have been considerable in recent decades. Yet much of the recent research on gender differences in employment and earnings has been of a more snapshot nature rather than taking a longer comparative look at evolving patterns. In this paper, we use 50 years (1964-2013) of US Census Annual Demographic Files (March Current Population Survey) to track the changing returns to human capital (measured as both educational attainment and potential work experience), estimating comparable earnings equations by gender at each point in time. We consider the effects of sample selection over time for both women and men and show the rising effect of selection for women in recent years. Returns to education diverge for women and men over this period in the selection-adjusted results but converge in the OLS results, while returns to potential experience converge in both sets of results. We also create annual calculations of synthetic lifetime labor force participation, hours, and earnings that indicate convergence by gender in worklife patterns, but less convergence in recent years in lifetime earnings. Thus, while some convergence has indeed occurred, the underlying mechanisms causing convergence differ for women and men, reflecting continued fundamental differences in women's and men's life experiences." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Lebenslauf; Berufsverlauf; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Männer; Frauen; Lebensarbeitszeit; Lebenseinkommen; Bildungsinvestitionen; Bildungsertrag; erwerbstätige Frauen; erwerbstätige Männer; Lohnunterschied; Konvergenz; USA; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1964; E 2013}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J3; J16; J24; N3}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k140918r18}, } 4 von 343 Datensätzen ausgegeben.