Suchprofil: EU-Arbeitsmarkt,_-Integration Durchsuchter Fertigstellungsmonat: 07/21 Sortierung: 1. SSCI-JOURNALS 2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN 3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN 4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER 5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR 6. BEITRÄGE ZU SAMMELWERKEN **************** 1. SSCI-JOURNALS **************** @Article{Andersson:2021:RWO, Journal= {International journal of social welfare}, Volume= {30}, Number= {3}, Author= {Lisa Andersson and Renate Minas}, Title= {Reaching without outreaching: A comparative policy study of EU member states policy agenda on youth unemployment}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {255-265}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12470}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12470}, Abstract= {"Youth unemployment is a global issue, with supranational actors calling for policy responses, including early interventions such as outreach. This article examines how EU member states have translated the EU youth guarantee (YG) recommendation, focusing on early interventions in the form of outreach. Combining quantitative content analysis with corpus linguistics, we examined the YG implementation plans of 19 EU member states having differing institutional conditions, comparing if and how they have incorporated outreach in their policy agenda. Overall we found very little outreach in the YG-plans. In the outreach described, guidance and information on education and labour market efforts dominate, whereas social work and local level community work is largely absent. We found type of outreach to be related to institutional conditions. Our results also imply that getting member states to commit to early interventions such as outreach requires that the EU stress this issue with greater emphasis." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Jugendarbeitslosigkeit; Arbeitslosigkeitsbekämpfung; Arbeitsmarktpolitik; internationaler Vergleich; Europäische Union; EU-Politik; Politikumsetzung; institutionelle Faktoren; Jugendsozialarbeit; benachteiligte Jugendliche; Schulabbrecher; nicht registrierte Arbeitslose; NEET; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2013-2016}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 2073}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210708KOJ}, } @Article{Dolado:2020:CNG, Journal= {Economic policy}, Volume= {35}, Number= {104}, Author= {Juan J. Dolado and Cecilia Garcia-Peñalosa and Linas Tarasonis}, Title= {The changing nature of gender selection into employment over the great recession}, Year= {2020}, Pages= {635-677}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiaa025}, Annote= {URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/161352}, Abstract= {"The Great Recession has strongly influenced employment patterns across skill and gender groups in EU countries. We analyse how these changes in workforce composition might distort comparisons of conventional measures of gender wage gaps via non-random selection of workers into EU labour markets. We document that male selection (traditionally disregarded) has become positive during the recession, particularly in Southern Europe. As for female selection (traditionally positive), our findings are twofold. Following an increase in the labour-force participation of less-skilled women, due to an added-worker effect, these biases declined in some countries where new female entrants were able to find jobs, whereas they went up in other countries which suffered large female employment losses. Finally, we document that most of these changes in selection patterns were reversed during the subsequent recovery phase, confirming their cyclical nature." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Europäisches Haushaltspanel; Ursache; internationaler Vergleich; Auswirkungen; Lohnunterschied; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; erwerbstätige Frauen; erwerbstätige Männer; Erwerbsbeteiligung; Rezession; geschlechtsspezifischer Arbeitsmarkt; Einkommenseffekte; qualifikationsspezifische Faktoren; Beschäftigungseffekte; Österreich; Belgien; Dänemark; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Italien; Niederlande; Irland; Portugal; Spanien; Großbritannien; Norwegen; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2004-2012}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J31}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 1091}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210707KM1}, } @Article{Rosnick:2007:ASW, Journal= {International journal of health services}, Volume= {37}, Number= {3}, Author= {David Rosnick and Mark Weisbrot}, Title= {Are Shorter Work Hours Good for the Environment? A Comparison of U.S. and European Energy Consumption}, Year= {2007}, Pages= {405-417}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.2190/D842-1505-1K86-9882}, Abstract= {"European employees work fewer hours per year, and use less energy per person, than their American counterparts. This article compares the European and U.S. models of labor productivity, supply, and energy consumption. It finds that if employees in the EU-15 worked as many hours as those in the United States, they would consume at least 15 percent more energy. This aspect of the debate over Europe's economic model reaches globally. Over the coming decades, developing countries will decide how to make use of their increasing productivity. If, by 2050, the world works as do Americans, total energy consumption could be 15 to 30 percent higher than it would be if following a more European model. Translated directly into higher carbon emissions, this could mean an additional 1 to 2 degrees Celsius in global warming." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Wochenarbeitszeit; Arbeitszeitverkürzung; Auswirkungen; Energieverbrauch; Umweltbelastung; internationaler Vergleich; Europäische Union; Emission; Umweltverschmutzung; Luft; Arbeitszeitverlängerung; Energieeinsparung; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Belgien; Dänemark; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Großbritannien; Irland; Italien; Luxemburg; Niederlande; Österreich; Portugal; Schweden; Spanien; USA; }, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 2343}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210630KIR}, } ************************************ 2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN ************************************ @Article{Danaj:2021:BMM, Journal= {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Sozialreform}, Volume= {67}, Number= {1}, Author= {Sonila Danaj and Ines Wagner}, Title= {Beware of the 'poverty migrant': media discourses on EU labour migration and the welfare state in Germany and the UK}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {1-27}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2021-0001}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zsr-2021-0001}, Abstract= {"This article examines the role of the media in the EU freedom of movement debate through the lens of high-circulation German and UK newspapers during the first half of 2014. It explores how the media problematised migration from Eastern European member states and its influence on national host country labour markets and welfare systems. It also analyses how different media outlets positioned themselves in relation to relevant policies or policy proposals. The findings show that most articles in our sample present low-skill, low-wage working European Union (EU) migrant class referred to as 'poverty migrants' as a problem to be addressed at the policy level in contrast with the economically self-sufficient migrant with marketable skills. The article contributes to discussions on work, welfare, and mobility in the EU by cross-fertilising the literature on migration policy, freedom of movement, social rights, and the media." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsmigration; Massenmedien; EU-Bürger; Freizügigkeit; internationaler Vergleich; Ost-West-Wanderung; Osteuropäer; Einwanderung; Auswirkungen; Beschäftigungseffekte; Wohlfahrtsstaat; Niedrigqualifizierte; Geringverdiener; Einwanderer; ausländische Arbeitnehmer; soziale Rechte; Zeitung; Herkunftsland; EU-Politik; Diskurs; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Großbritannien; Rumänien; Bulgarien; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2014-2014}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 1604}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210719KVF}, } ************************* 3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN ************************* @Article{Bachtroegler-Unger:2021:EEA, Journal= {Ifo-Schnelldienst}, Volume= {74}, Number= {6}, Author= {Julia Bachtr{\"o}gler-Unger and Mathias Dolls and Paul Sch{\"u}le and Hannes Taubenb{\"o}ck and Matthias Weigand}, Title= {Evaluation der EU-Regionalpolitik anhand von Satellitendaten}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {40-45}, Annote= {URL: https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v74y2021i06p40-45.html}, Annote= {URL: https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v74y2021i06p40-45.html}, Abstract= {"Zur Untersuchung lokaler Wachstumseffekte der EU-Regionalpolitik wurden für eine ausgewählte Pilotregion im Grenzgebiet zwischen Deutschland, Polen und Tschechien ein Mikrodatensatz zum Erhalt von EU-Förderung auf Projektebene mit Fernerkundungsdaten verschiedener Satelliten kombiniert. Dabei wird das Wachstum der regionalen Wirtschaft über Änderungen in der Intensität der jährlichen Nachtlichtemissionen erfasst. Auf Gemeindeebene lässt sich zeigen, dass der Erhalt höherer Förderbeträge mit höherem Wachstum einhergeht." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Regionalpolitik; Auswirkungen; Wirtschaftswachstum; Wirkungsforschung; Europäische Union; EU-Politik; regionale Wirtschaftsförderung; Datengewinnung; Weltraum; Raumfahrttechnik; Energieverbrauch; Grenzgebiet; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Polen; Tschechische Republik; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2007-2020}, Annote= {Sprache: de}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 032}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210630KIX}, } ********************************** 4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER ********************************** @Book{Linden:2021:DIB, Institution={Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Bruno Van der Linden}, Title= {Do in-work benefits work for low-skilled workers? : To boost the employment rate of the low-skilled trapped in inactivity is it sufficient to supplement their earnings?}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {11}, Address= {Bonn}, Series= {IZA world of labor}, Number= {246}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.246.v2}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.246.v2}, Abstract= {"Dauerhafte Lohnzuschüsse verbessern in vielen Fällen die sozioökonomische Position von Geringqualifizierten, denen es an finanziellen Arbeitsanreizen mangelt. Positive Wirkungen zeigen sich auch auf die psychische Gesundheit und die allgemeine Lebenszufriedenheit der Leistungsempfänger, deren Kinder teils ebenfalls profitieren. Ein Problem bleibt die Komplexität des Steuer- und Transfersystems. Es braucht also klar verständliche, unbefristete Lohnzuschüsse, die durch Unterstützung in den Bereichen Kinderbetreuung, Gesundheit und Wohnen flankiert werden." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)}, Abstract= {"High risk of poverty and low employment rates are widespread among low-skilled groups, especially in the case of some household compositions (e.g. single mothers). 'Making-work-pay' policies have been advocated for and implemented to address these issues. They alleviate the above-mentioned problems without providing a disincentive to work. However, do they deliver on their promises? If they do reduce poverty and enhance employment, is it possible to determine their effects on indicators of well-being, such as mental health and life satisfaction, or on the acquisition of human capital?" (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Niedrigqualifizierte; Lohnkostenzuschuss; Auswirkungen; Beschäftigungseffekte; berufliche Reintegration; Arbeitslose; Kombilohn; negative Einkommensteuer; allein Erziehende; Mütter; Arbeitsanreiz; Armut; Sozialhilfeempfänger; Gesundheitszustand; psychische Faktoren; Lebenssituation; Zufriedenheit; Umverteilung; OECD; Europäische Union; Geringverdiener; Einkommenseffekte; }, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J32 ; J30 ; J80}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210705KK0}, } @Book{Schneider:2021:LMI, Institution={Institut Ekonomických Studií (Prag) (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Ondrej Schneider}, Title= {Labor Migration in the European Union: The case of Central and Eastern Europe}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {26}, Address= {Praha}, Series= {IEW working paper / Institut Ekonomických Studií (Prag)}, Number= {2021,23}, Annote= {URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/fau/wpaper/wp2021_23.html}, Annote= {URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/fau/wpaper/wp2021_23.html}, Abstract= {"This paper examines migration trends in the European Union since the enlargements of 2004-2007, which brought 100 million citizens of eleven Central and Eastern European countries into the EU. We examine country- and regional-level data on migration trends and show how European integration depleted the labor force in new member countries. Several of them lost 10% of their population since 2006, most of it via negative net migration. In 2019, 18% of Romanians, 14% of Lithuanians, 13% Croats, and Bulgarians lived in another EU country. The quantitative analysis shows that migration contributed positively to regional convergence, as every percentage point of net migration increased GDP per capita by roughly 0.01% and reduced unemployment by 0.1-0.2 percentage points. Further analysis will be needed to disentangle aggregate migration effects to quantify its impact on regions that lose their population via migration." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsmigration; Europäische Union; Ost-West-Wanderung; Herkunftsland; internationale Migration; Entwicklung; EU-Osterweiterung; Auswirkungen; europäische Integration; Bevölkerungsrückgang; internationaler Vergleich; Einwanderung; Konvergenz; Bruttoinlandsprodukt; Arbeitslosenquote; Osteuropa; Westeuropa; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2005-2019}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: R11 ; F22 ; F66 ; O15 ; R23 ; J61}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210714KSG}, } *************************** 5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR *************************** @Book{Buhr:2021:IIW, Editor= {Daniel Buhr and Rolf Frankenberger and Wolfgang Schroeder and Udo Zolleis}, Title= {Innovation im Wohlfahrtsstaat : Neue Ideen f{\"u}r Wissenschaft und Politik. Festschrift f{\"u}r Josef Schmid}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {330}, Address= {Baden-Baden}, Publisher= {Nomos}, Series= {Wirtschafts- und Sozialpolitik}, Number= {24}, ISBN= {ISBN 978-3-8487-8134-8}, Abstract= {"Gesellschaften wandeln sich stetig – und mit ihnen die Bedürfnisse der Menschen. Der Politik kommt die Aufgabe zu, den Wandel zu begleiten und zu steuern. Der Sammelband vereint Beiträge aus der Forschung zu Innovation und Wohlfahrtsstaat, Parteien und Verbänden sowie zur Politikberatung und gibt so einen Überblick über aktuelle Entwicklungen. Dabei vermittelt er einen Einblick in die Vielschichtigkeit der Politikfeldanalyse in Forschung, Transfer und Beratung. Gleichzeitig ehrt der Band mit Josef Schmid einen Wissenschaftler, der in und mit seinem Wirken Theorie und Praxis, Beratung und Lehre in der Politikfeldanalyse und politischen Wirtschaftslehre verbunden, vorangebracht und maßgeblich geprägt hat." (Verlagsangaben, IAB-Doku)}, Abstract= {"Societies are constantly changing-and with them people's needs. Politics has the task of accompanying and steering change. This volume brings together contributions from research on innovation and the welfare state, political parties and associations as well as policy advice, thus providing an overview of current developments in this field. In doing so, it provides an insight into the complexity of policy area analysis in research, transfer and consultancy. At the same time, the volume pays tribute to Josef Schmid, a scholar whose work has linked, advanced and significantly shaped theory and practice, consultancy and teaching in policy analysis and political economy." (Publisher information, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Wohlfahrtsstaat; Innovation; Sozialstaat; Sozialpolitik; Modernisierung; Zukunftsperspektive; Partei; Gewerkschaftspolitik; Gesundheitspolitik; gesetzliche Krankenversicherung; EU-Politik; Kreditpolitik; Ökonomisierung; Finanzkrise; Auswirkungen; Arbeitsmarktpolitik; Beratungskonzept; Politikberatung; Wissenschaft; Wirtschaftsförderung; Demokratie; technischer Wandel; Industrieländer; internationaler Vergleich; politisches System; politische Ökonomie; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; }, Annote= {Sprache: de}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210702KKD}, } @Book{DeGroen:2021:DLP, Institution={Europ{\"a}ische Kommission. Generaldirektion Besch{\"a}ftigung, Soziales und Integration (Hrsg.) ; Centre for European Policy Studies (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Willem Pieter (Proj.-Ltr.) De Groen and Zachary Kilhoffer and Leonie Westhoff and Doina Postica and Farzaneh Shamsfakhr}, Title= {Digital labour platforms in the EU : Mapping and business models : final report}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {150}, Address= {Br{\"u}ssel}, ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-76-37273-8}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/doi: 10.2767/224624}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/doi: 10.2767/224624}, Abstract= {"This is the final report of the study on 'Digital labour platforms in the EU: Mapping and business models' for the Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion (DG EMPL). In total, 516 active and another 74 inactive digital labour platforms (DLPs) in the EU27 have been identified. For each of these DLPs, information on the business model has been collected and analysed. Moreover, for a sample of 38 DLPs, details on the working conditions have been collected and analysed for one or more countries. This study illustrates that DLPs have grown rapidly in the last five years, though still small in size with EUR 14 billion in activity. DLPs act as intermediaries for a large range of activities, including freelance, contest-based, microtask, taxi, delivery, home and professional services. DLPs intermediating the same services often follow similar business models, nevertheless the working conditions can differ between these platforms and even for the same platform across countries." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Plattformökonomie; Unternehmensentwicklung; Unternehmensform; Europäische Union; Arbeitsbedingungen; Ertrag; Lohn; Gewinn; Arbeitsvermittlung; Auftragsvergabe; internationaler Vergleich; Dienstleistungsarbeit; Beschäftigungsform; Internetwirtschaft; Selbständige; sektorale Verteilung; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2016-2020}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210714KSM}, } @Book{Fries-Tersch:2021:IMS, Institution={Europ{\"a}ische Kommission. Generaldirektion Besch{\"a}ftigung, Soziales und Integration (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Elena Fries-Tersch and Linus Si{\"o}land and Matthew Jones and Caterina Mariotti and Monika Malecka}, Title= {Intra-EU mobility of seasonal workers: Trends and challenges : Final report March 2021}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {87}, Address= {Br{\"u}ssel}, ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-76-32636-6}, Annote= {URL: https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=738&langId=en&pubId=8400&furtherPubs=yes}, Abstract= {"The study identifies key challenges faced by intra-EU seasonal workers, such as lack of access to information about their rights, inadequate social protection, poor accommodation, low pay and challenging working conditions. These challenges were aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic, with many seasonal workers not being able to carry out their work, poor housing being particularly dangerous in times of a pandemic, and non-resident seasonal workers being trapped in countries of work and not able to return home." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Saisonarbeitnehmer; internationale Migration; Beschäftigungsentwicklung; Europäische Union; Landwirtschaft; Gastgewerbe; EU-Bürger; Arbeitsrecht; Sozialrecht; Saisonarbeit; Arbeitsbedingungen; Pandemie; Auswirkungen; Herkunftsland; Beschäftigungsland; Arbeitnehmerüberlassung; grenzüberschreitende Zusammenarbeit; internationaler Vergleich; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2015-2020}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210713KR6}, } @Book{Konle-Seidl:2021:SMI, Institution={European Parliament, Policy Department A: Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Regina Konle-Seidl}, Title= {Strengthening minimum income protection in the EU}, Year= {2021}, Pages= {11}, Address= {Br{\"u}ssel}, ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-846-7885-3}, Annote= {URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/662900/IPOL_BRI(2021)662900_EN.pdf}, Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.2861/80638}, Annote= {URL: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/662900/IPOL_BRI(2021)662900_EN.pdf}, Abstract= {"KEY FINDINGS: Principle 14 of the European Pillar of Social Rights (EPSR) lays the foundation for the right to an adequate minimum income. The Commission's Action Plan on the implementation of the EPSR - presented on March 4, 2021 - proposes a Council Recommendation on minimum income to be adopted in 2022. In parallel, the Action Plan sets a new target of reducing the number of persons at-risk-of poverty and social exclusion by at least 15 million in 2030. The European Parliament, on the other hand, is calling for legally enforceable social rights and for specific social objectives to be reached by 2030. Regardless of whether a directive or just a recommendation on a minimum income instrument to alleviate poverty and social exclusion is agreed upon, there are several aspects to be considered. First, the role of minimum income schemes (MIS) in the wider social protection systems of Member States should be taken into account. Institutional differences in national social protection arrangements are important to understand the role and scope of MIS in the respective Member State. Comparing minimum benefit levels alone gives an incomplete picture of the support that is available in practice for low-income households. Second, the monitoring framework at EU level has to be improved. A more coherent implementation of targets at national level compared to what happened under the EUROPE-2020 strategy is needed. Comparing the effectiveness of Member States' minimum income systems in terms of adequacy, access to benefits and enabling services also requires the collection of national administrative data, e.g. on the kind and extent of social and employment support and research on its impact on overcoming poverty. To derive suggestions for sound anti-poverty policies and to foster upward convergence in the EU it is important to review performance indicators such as at risk of poverty (AROP) which measures income inequality rather than poverty. Existing indicators need to be extended to include further dimensions, i.e. how far are the poor from the poverty line and the capacity of minimum income schemes to reach those in need. Recent improvements in this respect should be developed further and consequently incorporated into the European Semester" (Text excerpt, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindesteinkommen; Mindestlohn; Europäische Union; europäische Sozialpolitik; europäische Sozialcharta; soziale Mindeststandards; Existenzminimum; Reformpolitik; }, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K210611J5U}, } 11 von 375 Datensätzen ausgegeben.