Suchprofil: EU-Arbeitsmarkt,_-Integration Durchsuchter Fertigstellungsmonat: 08/16 Sortierung: 1. SSCI-JOURNALS 2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN 3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN 4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER 5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR 6. BEITRÄGE ZU SAMMELWERKEN **************** 1. SSCI-JOURNALS **************** @Article{Bertola:2016:LPA, Journal= {European Economic Review}, Volume= {87}, Number= {August}, Author= {Giuseppe Bertola}, Title= {Labor policies and capital mobility in theory and in EMU}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {62-77}, ISBN= {ISSN 0014-2921}, Abstract= {"Europe?s Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) was characterized by large international imbalances and uneven national labor market reforms. In this paper?s model, labor policies that aim to increase the welfare of capital-poor individuals within each country are influenced by financial integration across differently capital-abundant countries. The model predicts that capital outflows should be associated with labor market deregulation, as was the case in EMU, and helps interpret inequality developments and policy tensions in that experience." (Author's abstract, © 2016 Elsevier) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitskräftemobilität; Kapitalmobilität; Währungsunion; Wirtschaftsunion; europäische Integration; Eurozone; Konvergenz; institutionelle Faktoren; Freizügigkeit; Eurozone; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1998; E 2007}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F2; J08}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 252}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160822b01}, } @Article{Bertoli:2016:ECA, Journal= {Regional Science and Urban Economics}, Volume= {60}, Number= {September}, Author= {Simone Bertoli and Herbert Br{\"u}cker and Jesùs Fernàndez-Moraga Huertas}, Title= {The European crisis and migration to Germany}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {61-72}, ISBN= {ISSN 0166-0462}, Abstract= {Migrationsströme nach Deutschland verbreiterten sich im Gefolge der Krise im Jahr 2010 in Europa, und das Papier untersucht die wichtigsten Determinanten dieses beträchtlichen Anstiegs. Internationale Migranten neigen dazu, mehr als einmal in ihrem Leben umzuziehen und in dieser Hinsicht machen auch die Migrationsepisoden nach Deutschland keine Ausnahme. Das Papier untersucht unter Verwendung bilateraler monatlicher Migrationsdaten einige relevante Implikationen dieser einfachen Beobachtung zur Abschätzung von Anziehungsmodellen. Dabei kann gezeigt werden, dass wenn man die Natur dieser Migrationsentscheidungen ignoriert, es zu einem Anstieg multilateralen Widerstands gegen Migration kommen kann. Es kann auch gezeigt werden, dass die Erwartungen künftiger Wirtschaftsentwicklung im Herkunftsland bilaterale Migrationsentscheidungen für Deutschland signifikant beeinflussen. (IAB)}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: internationale Wanderung; Wanderungsmotivation; Wanderungsstatistik; Migrationstheorie; Wanderungspolitik; Einwanderungspolitik; Wirtschaftskrise; EU-Osterweiterung; osteuropäischer Transformationsprozess; Wirtschaftsentwicklung; Zukunftsperspektive; Einwanderungsland; Entscheidungskriterium; Migrationsforschung; institutionelle Faktoren; Arbeitslosenquote; Kapitalmarkt; Herkunftsland; Europäische Union; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2006; E 2014}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F22; O15; J61}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 1057}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160801301}, } @Article{Brandolini:2016:FUS, Journal= {Journal of Common Market Studies}, Volume= {54}, Number= {5}, Author= {Andrea Brandolini and Francesca Carta and Francesco D'Amuri}, Title= {A feasible unemployment-based shock absorber for the euro area}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {1123-1141}, ISBN= {ISSN 0021-9886}, Abstract= {"Based on theoretical insights, this article identifies the broad characteristics that a shock absorber based on unemployment should have in order to be incentive-compatible and politically feasible. It then empirically derives the combination of activation thresholds, experience rating, eligibility criteria and benefit generosity which define the systems offering the highest stabilization for given levels of redistribution. The analysis suggests that the shock absorber should: (1) give rise to macro cross-national transfers, mimicking those that would be generated by a notional euro-wide unemployment benefit scheme of minimal coverage and generosity, (2) be activated by a trigger and (3) feature partial experience rating. The simulation results, confirmed by robustness checks, show that even systems that do not redistribute resources between countries can have a non-negligible stabilization impact in the medium run. Low benefit take-up rates in southern Europe reduce the stabilization properties and the size of the scheme." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitslosigkeit; Arbeitslosigkeitsbewältigung; Finanzpolitik; Konjunkturzyklus; Arbeitslosenunterstützung; Stabilitätspolitik; Konjunkturpolitik; Transferleistung; Umverteilung; Eurozone; }, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: E6; J65; H53}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 661}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160808b01}, } @Article{Percoco:2016:LMI, Journal= {Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie}, Volume= {107}, Number= {3}, Author= {Marco Percoco}, Title= {Labour market institutions : sensitivity to the cycle and impact of the crisis in european regions}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {375-385}, ISBN= {ISSN 0040-747X}, Abstract= {"The current economic crisis has had spatially differentiated impacts in both the US and Europe. A growing collection of literature investigates the determinants of the magnitude of this recession across regions. This paper aims to contribute to this literature by analysing variations in unemployment rate across European regions over the period 2004--11. In particular, we focus on two apparently neglected issues, namely labour market rigidity and the sensitivity of the local economy to the national or European business cycle. The rigidity of the labour market is increasingly viewed as a possible reason for differences among countries in terms of the performance of labour markets, although existing empirical evidence remains inconclusive. In this respect, our aim is to assess the relevance of national labour legislation, as measured by the OECD Employment Protection Legislation (EPL) Index for the performance of regional labour markets by taking advantage of the natural experiment provided by the crisis. Furthermore, for the first time in economic literature, we employ quarterly data on unemployment rate for all European regions over the period 2000--11 to construct an index of co--movement regarding regional cycles with national or European cycles, to be used as an important determinant of variation in the unemployment rate. After controlling for a number of covariates, as well as for spatial dependence in various forms, our results indicate that EPL did not affect unemployment growth over the entire period. However, we did find that regions with a low long--term unemployment rate in countries with high EPL performed better in the pre-crisis period (2004--07), whereas no effect was found during the crisis. We also found that synchronisation of the regional cycle with the national one was significant for explaining regional labour market performance. Taken together, these results denote the limited relevance of national policies and legislation for accommodating spatially differentiated shocks, whereas policies aimed at modifying local cycles may prove to be more effective." (Author's abstract, Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsmarktentwicklung - internationaler Vergleich; Region; Konjunkturabhängigkeit; Konjunkturentwicklung; institutionelle Faktoren; Rigidität; Lohnstarrheit; Rezession; regionale Disparität; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Tschechische Republik; Griechenland; Spanien; Finnland; Frankreich; Irland; Italien; Portugal; Schweden; Slowakei; Großbritannien; Europäische Union; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2004; E 2011}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 1093}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160801b05}, } @Article{Sánchez-Pagés:2016:ICA, Journal= {The Scandinavian Journal of Economics}, Volume= {118}, Number= {3}, Author= {Santiago Sánchez-Pagés and Ángel Solano García}, Title= {Immigration, conflict, and redistribution}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {557-593}, ISBN= {ISSN 0347-0520}, Abstract= {"In this paper, we analyze how the possibility of conflict between natives and immigrants shapes income redistribution in developed democracies. This possibility can generate income redistribution towards immigrants even if they have no voting rights. We show that the threat of conflict between natives and immigrants lowers vertical income redistribution (from the rich to the poor) as the level of immigration increases. The opposite holds for horizontal income redistribution (from natives to immigrants), which increases with the level of immigration. Income inequality weakens the negative effect of immigration on vertical redistribution, but it also reduces horizontal redistribution. These theoretical predictions are consistent with the results of our empirical analysis on data from 29 European countries: larger immigrant populations are associated with more redistribution towards immigrants and lower vertical redistribution." (Author's abstract, Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Einwanderer; Umverteilung; Verteilungsgerechtigkeit; Verteilungspolitik - internationaler Vergleich; Einkommensunterschied; Ungleichheit; sozialer Konflikt; Inländer; Einkommensverteilung; Einwanderung; Einwanderungsland; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; Industrieländer; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2003; E 2011}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: D72; D74; F22}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 440}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160802b03}, } ************************************ 2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN ************************************ @Article{Altemeyer-Bartscher:2016:ODR, Journal= {Intereconomics}, Volume= {51}, Number= {4}, Author= {Martin Altemeyer-Bartscher and Oliver Holtem{\"o}ller and Axel Lindner and Andreas Schmalzbauer and G{\"o}tz Zeddies}, Title= {On the distribution of refugees in the EU}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {220-228}, ISBN= {ISSN 0020-5346}, Abstract= {"The current situation regarding the migration of refugees can only be handled efficiently through closer international cooperation in the field of asylum policy. From an economic point of view, it would be reasonable to distribute incoming refugees among all EU countries according to a distribution key that reflects differences in the costs of integration in the individual countries. An efficient distribution would even out the marginal costs of integrating refugees. In order to reach a political agreement, the key for distributing refugees should be complemented by compensation payments that distribute the costs of integration among countries. The key for distributing refugees presented by the EU Commission takes account of appropriate factors in principle, but it is unclear in terms of detail. The compensation payments for countries that should take relatively high numbers of refugees for cost efficiency reasons should be financed by reallocating resources within the EU budget." (Author's abstract, © Springer-Verlag) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Flüchtlinge; regionale Verteilung; Verteilungspolitik; EU-Politik; Asylpolitik; Finanzausgleich; öffentliche Ausgaben; internationale Zusammenarbeit; Asylbewerber; Lastenausgleich; berufliche Integration; soziale Integration; volkswirtschaftliche Kosten; Quotierung; Europäische Union; EU-Staat; }, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 127}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160810b06}, } ************************* 3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN ************************* @Article{Fabian:2016:EBS, Journal= {Weiterbildung. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Grundlagen, Praxis und Trends}, Volume= {16}, Number= {4}, Author= {Barbara Fabian}, Title= {Europ{\"a}ische Bildungspolitik: Schwerpunkte der Juncker-Kommission : F{\"o}rderung von Besch{\"a}ftigung und Wachstum}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {6-10}, ISBN= {ISSN 1861-0501}, Abstract= {"Die aktuelle europäische Bildungspolitik fügt sich ein in die von Kommissionspräsident Juncker am 15. Juli 2014 präsentierten politischen Leitlinien für die von ihm geführte Europäische Kommission 2014 bis 2019. Angesichts einer hohen Arbeitslosenquote und eines dramatischen Anstiegs der Jugendarbeitslosigkeit steht die Förderung von Beschäftigung und Wachstum ganz oben auf der politischen Agenda der EU." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: EU-Politik; europäische Bildungspolitik; Jugendarbeitslosigkeit; Arbeitslosigkeitsbekämpfung; Wachstumspolitik; Beschäftigungspolitik; Beschäftigungsförderung; Berufsbildungspolitik; Weiterbildung; Niedrigqualifizierte; Weiterbildungsförderung; europäischer Qualifikationsrahmen; Reformpolitik; Europäische Union; }, Annote= {Sprache: de}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 1049}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160809b01}, } ********************************** 4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER ********************************** @Book{Balleix:2016:SCW, Institution={OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Corinne Balleix}, Title= {Strengthening co-operation with countries of origin}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {57}, Address= {Paris}, Series= {OECD social, employment and migration working papers}, Number= {183}, ISBN= {ISSN 1815-199X}, Abstract= {"This paper is part of the joint project between the Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs of the European Commission and the OECD's Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs on 'Review of Labour Migration Policy in Europe'. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Grant: HOME/2013/EIFX/CA/002 / 30-CE-0615920/00-38 (DI130895) A previous version of this paper was presented and discussed at the OECD Working Party on Migration in June 2015.The paper presents the main instruments for co-operation with third countries in the area of labour immigration - policy instruments constituted by the mobility partnerships, financial instruments, as well as legal instruments. For each of them, the study examines the reference sources underpinning the activity, the manner in which labour immigration is organised, and the ways of promoting ethical recruitment. The paper then draws up a frame of reference on these instruments, followed by specific references to the labour immigration policies of certain Member States, and certain third countries, serving to illustrate the arguments." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsmigration; Wanderungspolitik; internationale Zusammenarbeit; Drittstaatsangehörige; EU-Politik; Rekrutierung; Einwanderungspolitik; Beschäftigungsfähigkeit; Förderungsmaßnahme; Hochqualifizierte; Arbeitserlaubnis; ausländische Arbeitnehmer; Europäische Union; Entwicklungsländer; Schwellenländer; }, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F22; F53; F55; N44}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160720r08}, } @Book{Colussi:2016:IIC, Institution={OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Tommaso Colussi}, Title= {The impact of the implementation of council directives on labour migration flows from third countries to EU countries}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {43}, Address= {Paris}, Series= {OECD social, employment and migration working papers}, Number= {181}, ISBN= {ISSN 1815-199X}, Abstract= {"This paper is part of the joint project between the Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs of the European Commission and the OECD's Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs on 'Review of Labour Migration Policy in Europe'. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Grant: HOME/2013/EIFX/CA/002 / 30-CE-0615920/00-38 (DI130895) A previous version of this paper (DELSA/ELSA/MI(2015)4) was presented and discussed at the OECD Working Party on Migration in June 2015. The paper assesses the impact of three European Directives - Student Directive, Researcher Directive and the Blue Card Directive - on migration flows from third countries to the EU. Using a difference-in-difference empirical strategy and data from the EU-LFS and Eurostat database on work permits to non-EU workers, it estimates the effect of each Directive on the inflow of targeted third country nationals. Overall, the econometric analysis does not provide evidence of a direct impact of the implementation of either of the Directives on the inflow of targeted groups. Most member states did experience an increase in the inflow of non-EU high skilled workers after the adoption of the Blue Card Directive; however, this increase can be almost entirely explained by positive pre-existing trends in the inflow of this type of immigrants. Similarly, despite the increase in the number of permits issued to students and researchers from third countries in Europe, difference-in-differences estimates do not provide evidence of a direct effect of the implementation of the Student and Researcher Directive on changes in this type of inflows. The absence of a measurable impact of the three Directives analysed may be due to delayed effects of policy changes, which take time to filter into perception and thus affect immigrant inflows to Europe." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsmigration; Drittstaatsangehörige; Einwanderungspolitik; EU-Politik; EU-Richtlinie; Arbeitserlaubnis; ausländische Arbeitnehmer; ausländische Studenten; Wissenschaftler; Politikumsetzung - Auswirkungen; Einwanderung - internationaler Vergleich; Einwanderer - Quote; Hochqualifizierte; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2002; E 2013}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F22; J61; K37; R23}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160720r06}, } @Book{David:2016:DAI, Institution={OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Anda David and Jean-Noël Senne}, Title= {A descriptive analysis of immigration to and emigration from the EU}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {65}, Address= {Paris}, Series= {OECD social, employment and migration working papers}, Number= {184}, ISBN= {ISSN 1815-199X}, Abstract= {"This paper is part of the joint project between the Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs of the European Commission and the OECD's Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs on 'Review of Labour Migration Policy in Europe'. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Grant: HOME/2013/EIFX/CA/002 / 30-CE-0615920/00-38 (DI130895) A previous version of this paper was presented and discussed at the OECD Working Party on Migration in June 2015. The paper examines immigration to, and emigration from, the European Union, and compares them with migrant inflows and outflows to other OECD destinations. It investigates how the migrants are distributed in terms of gender, age, education and labour force status, depending on their country of origin as well as of destination. Drawing upon the Database on Immigrants in the OECD countries (DIOC), changes in migration rates and stock are analysed over time, focusing on whether the EU is facing a net gain or loss of skills." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Einwanderung - internationaler Vergleich; Auswanderung - internationaler Vergleich; EU-Bürger; Zielgebiet; Auswanderer; Herkunftsland; Einwanderer; Qualifikationsstruktur; Erwerbsquote; Altersstruktur; Geschlechterverteilung; Europäische Union; OECD; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2000; E 2010}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F22; J11; N34}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160720r09}, } @Book{Farchy:2016:IIM, Institution={OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Emily Farchy}, Title= {The impact of intra-EU mobility on immigration by third-country foreign workers}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {49}, Address= {Paris}, Series= {OECD social, employment and migration working papers}, Number= {179}, ISBN= {ISSN 1815-199X}, Abstract= {"This paper is part of the joint project between the Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs of the European Commission and the OECD's Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs on 'Review of Labour Migration Policy in Europe'. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Grant: HOME/2013/EIFX/CA/002 / 30-CE-0615920/00-38 (DI130895) A previous version of this paper (DELSA/ELSA/MI(2015)10) was presented and discussed at the OECD working party on migration in June 2015 This paper examines the impact of the free flow of migrants within the EU on the prospects of labour migrants from third countries - the extent to which free movement migrants and third country migrants are substitutes or complements on the labour market. The first section of this paper looks at the recent trends in migration to the European Union, with a particular focus on trends in the 'big five' recipient countries. The analysis is supplemented by the use of micro data from the EU Labour Force Survey, to examine the extent to which the socio-economic and job characteristics suggest that EU migrants and third country migrants provide a similar labour input. Aggregate migrant flows, however, are driven by both supply and demand factors; a comparison of aggregate trends is therefore insufficient to disentangle the disparate drivers of these trends. A booming economy, for example, will attract labour migrants from both EU and third countries, yet the positive relation between these flows cannot be attributed to a complementarity between these labour inputs but rather to the demand side factors that drive them both. To overcome this endogeneity the second section of this paper utilizes the natural experiment of EU enlargement to isolate the impact of the increased supply of free movement migrants on third country migrant populations. Abstracting in this manner from the economic factors that have played such an important role in determining labour demand in recent years the empirical analysis of this paper identifies a negative impact on the arrivals of third country migrants when labour supply from new EU migrants increases. Furthermore, the lack of identifiable impact on the employment rate of third country migrants is dependent on assumptions regarding the counterfactual employment outcomes of these displaced third country migrants." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: EU-Bürger; internationale Wanderung - Auswirkungen; Drittstaatsangehörige; Einwanderung - internationaler Vergleich; ausländische Arbeitnehmer; Freizügigkeit; Substitutionselastizität; Beschäftigungseffekte; Arbeitsmigration; Osteuropäer; Europäische Union; Großbritannien; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Spanien; Italien; Frankreich; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2000; E 2012}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F22; J61; R23}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160720r05}, } @Book{Hansen:2016:EUE, Institution={OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Peo Hansen}, Title= {The European Union's external labour migration policy : rationale, objectives, approaches and results, 1999-2014}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {33}, Address= {Paris}, Series= {OECD social, employment and migration working papers}, Number= {185}, ISBN= {ISSN 1815-199X}, Abstract= {"This paper is part of the joint project between the Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs of the European Commission and the OECD's Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs on 'Review of Labour Migration Policy in Europe'. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Grant: HOME/2013/EIFX/CA/002 / 30-CE-0615920/00-38 (DI130895) A previous version of this paper (DELSA/ELSA/MI(2015)2) was presented and discussed at the OECD Working Party on Migration in June 2015. This paper presents an overview and analysis of the policy development at the EU level regarding external labour migration (ELM). It reviews the shift in ELM policy at the EU level by examining documents and debates. It looks at the treatment of ELM, setting out from the Amsterdam Treaty and then follows the development up to the present, paying close attention to the evolving rational for increasing ELM. The difference between the horizontal approach and the sectoral approach is explained. The major ELM Directives under the sectoral approach are presented and discussed in terms of how they were negotiated and how they fit into the overall ELM policy strategy. The document concludes by identifying current political challenges for expanding the EU approach beyond its present form." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsmigration; Einwanderungspolitik; EU-Politik; politischer Wandel; Drittstaatsangehörige; EU-Richtlinie; EU-Kommission; ausländische Studenten; Wissenschaftler; Arbeitserlaubnis; ausländische Arbeitnehmer; Saisonarbeitnehmer; multinationale Unternehmen; Arbeitskräftemobilität; EU-Recht; Ausländerrecht; Europäische Union; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1999; E 2014}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F22; K37; N44}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160720r10}, } @Book{Poeschel:2016:RMT, Institution={OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Friedrich Poeschel}, Title= {Raising the mobility of third-country nationals in the EU : effects from naturalisation and long-term resident status}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {44}, Address= {Paris}, Series= {OECD social, employment and migration working papers}, Number= {187}, ISBN= {ISSN 1815-199X}, Abstract= {"This paper is part of the joint project between the Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs of the European Commission and the OECD's Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs on 'Review of Labour Migration Policy in Europe'. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Grant: HOME/2013/EIFX/CA/002 / 30-CE-0615920/00-38 (DI130895) A previous version of this paper (DELSA/ELSA/MI(2015)5) was presented and discussed at the OECD working party on migration in June 2015. The functioning of labour markets in the European Union can benefit if third-country nationals become more mobile between EU member states. Using micro data from the EU Labour Force Survey, this paper measures their mobility and investigates whether it is raised by naturalisation or long-term resident status. While third-country nationals are overall less mobile than EU citizens, tertiary-educated persons appear equally mobile in both groups. Raising the mobility of all third-country nationals to the level of EU citizens would add at least 25 000 mobile persons. Causal effects on mobility from long-term resident status and naturalisation are identified through a difference-in-difference approach. Results suggest that long-term resident status increases the mobility of third-country nationals by 2%-6%. To avoid selection bias in the results for naturalisation, this paper draws on a natural experiment: following the accession of Central and Eastern European countries to the EU, all their citizens indiscriminately obtained the rights of EU citizens. The evidence suggests that those who were already living in other EU countries became more mobile as a result. These findings highlight that intra-EU mobility of third-country nationals depends on their rights to reside and work in other EU countries." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Einwanderungspolitik; EU-Politik; Arbeitsmigration; Drittstaatsangehörige; ausländische Arbeitnehmer; Einwanderer; Aufenthaltsdauer; Aufenthaltsrecht - Auswirkungen; Einbürgerung - Auswirkungen; regionale Mobilität; internationale Wanderung - internationaler Vergleich; Mobilitätsförderung; Herkunftsland; Aufenthaltserlaubnis; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2008; E 2013}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F22; J61; K37}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160720r12}, } @Book{Ramasamy:2016:REA, Institution={OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Sankar Ramasamy}, Title= {The role of employers and employer engagement in labour migration from third countries to the EU}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {38}, Address= {Paris}, Series= {OECD social, employment and migration working papers}, Number= {178}, ISBN= {ISSN 1815-199X}, Abstract= {"This paper is part of the joint project between the Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs of the European Commission and the OECD's Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs on 'Review of Labour Migration Policy in Europe'. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Grant: HOME/2013/EIFX/CA/002 / 30-CE-0615920/00-38 (DI130895). A previous version of this paper DELSA/ELSA/MI(2015)8 was presented and discussed at the OECD working party on migration in June 2015. The paper examines the ways in which employers are protagonists in international labour migration, and what can be done to ensure that they are partners in increasing European attractiveness for internationally mobile talent. Facilitating movement of Intra-Corporate Transfer (ICT) workers in multinational companies, improving the ability of SMEs to access foreign workers, as well as attracting entrepreneurs and investors in the EU single market, are the three principal channels examined in the report. The paper provides recommendations for policy development in these three areas." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Beschäftigerverhalten; Rekrutierung; Drittstaatsangehörige; ausländische Arbeitnehmer; multinationale Unternehmen; innerbetriebliche Mobilität; Mobilitätsförderung; Klein- und Mittelbetrieb; Arbeitserlaubnis; Aufenthaltsrecht; EU-Binnenmarkt; Auslandsinvestitionen; Investitionsförderung; EU-Politik; Einwanderungspolitik - internationaler Vergleich; Arbeitsmigration; Europäische Union; }, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F22; F21; J61}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160720r04}, } @Book{Robin-Olivier:2016:CPP, Institution={OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Sophie Robin-Olivier}, Title= {The community preference principle in labour migration policy in the European Union}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {27}, Address= {Paris}, Series= {OECD social, employment and migration working papers}, Number= {182}, ISBN= {ISSN 1815-199X}, Abstract= {"This paper is part of the joint project between the Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs of the European Commission and the OECD's Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs on 'Review of Labour Migration Policy in Europe'. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Grant: HOME/2013/EIFX/CA/002 / 30-CE-0615920/00-38 (DI130895) A previous version of this paper was presented and discussed at the OECD Working Party on Migration in June 2015.The paper investigates the notion of the 'community preference' which in filling job posts gives a priority to EU-nationals over third-country nationals. Analysing the impact of the principle on the European labour migration policy, the report presents a brief history of the notion, and discusses how it is referred to in EU labour migration policy documents. It also examines the challenges that the principle is facing as the EU immigration policy develops, tending to give increasing rights to third-country nationals." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: EU-Politik; Einwanderungspolitik; Arbeitsmigration; Arbeitserlaubnis; ausländische Arbeitnehmer; EU-Bürger; Präferenz; Drittstaatsangehörige; Stellenbesetzung; EU-Richtlinie; Hochqualifizierte; Saisonarbeitnehmer; multinationale Unternehmen; Politikumsetzung; Arbeitskräftemobilität; Europäische Union; Frankreich; }, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F22; K31; K37; N44}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160720r07}, } @Book{Weisser:2016:IMS, Institution={OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Reinhard Weisser}, Title= {Internationally mobile students and their post-graduation migratory behaviour : an analysis of determinants of student mobility and retention rates in the EU}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {95}, Address= {Paris}, Series= {OECD social, employment and migration working papers}, Number= {186}, ISBN= {ISSN 1815-199X}, Abstract= {"This paper is part of the joint project between the Directorate General for Migration and Home Affairs of the European Commission and the OECD's Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs on 'Review of Labour Migration Policy in Europe'. This document has been produced with the financial assistance of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Grant: HOME/2013/EIFX/CA/002 / 30-CE-0615920/00-38 (DI130895) A previous version of this paper was presented and discussed at the OECD Working Party on Migration in June 2015.The paper investigates the preferences and post-graduation mobility behaviour of international students, focusing on how the EU could succeed in attracting and keeping highly educated talent from across the globe. Providing their skills to European labour markets, graduates from outside the EU have a potential to enrich the supply of high-skilled labour. Seen as the 28 EU countries still constitute the most attractive destination area for studying abroad, the paper examines different calculation methods in order to generate stay rates for over 170 countries of origin. Empirical results indicate that for the EU as a whole, aggregate stay rates from stayers from all non-EU source countries lie within a range of 16.4% and 29.1%. They are also typically very low among students from other OECD countries, and much higher for students from less developed or politically less stable countries. The paper concludes by recommending a catalogue of measures to boost the EU's attractiveness, and to increase stay rates. Proposed policy measures draw on a smooth labour market integration of international graduates, as well as on cultivating strong points of the European countries, such as: political stability and participation possibilities, reliable institutions and governance structure, as well as an innovative and competitive environment." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: ausländische Studenten; Hochschulabsolventen; internationale Wanderung; Wanderungsmotivation; Herkunftsland; Aufenthaltsdauer; Einwanderung - internationaler Vergleich; Drittstaatsangehörige; Zielgebiet; Studienfach; Auslandstätigkeit; Beschäftigungseffekte; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2002; E 2012}, Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F22; I23}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160720r11}, } *************************** 5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR *************************** @Book{Europaeische:2016:IUO, Institution={Europ{\"a}ische Kommission, Generaldirektion Besch{\"a}ftigung, Soziales und Integration (Hrsg.)}, Title= {The impact of unemployment on heart disease and stroke mortality in European Union countries}, Year= {2016}, Pages= {48}, Address= {Paris}, ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-79-59741-1}, Abstract= {"This paper examines the relation between unemployment and cardiovascular disease mortality in EU countries between 2000 and 2010. Two separate studies are summarized and highlight the increase in heart disease and stroke mortality rates as potential outcomes of the greatly extended unemployment rate during this period." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitslosigkeit - Auswirkungen; Herzinfarkt; Herzkrankheit; Sterblichkeit; Kreislauferkrankung; Arbeitslosenquote; Bruttoinlandsprodukt - Auswirkungen; Europäische Union; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2000; E 2010}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160728r01}, } @Book{European:2015:GEI, Institution={European Institute for Gender Equality (Hrsg.)}, Title= {Gender equality index 2015 : measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005-2012. Report}, Year= {2015}, Pages= {189}, Address= {Vilnius}, Series= {Gender equality index}, ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-9218-814-6}, Annote= {URL: http://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/mh0215616enn.pdf}, Abstract= {"The Gender Equality Index provides a comprehensive measure of gender equality, tailored to fit the EU policy context. Following the importance of cohesion across EU Member States, the Gender Equality Index ensures that higher gender equality scores can only be obtained in societies where there are small gender gaps and high levels of achievement. The present update includes scores for 2005, 2010 and 2012, for the first time allowing for an assessment of the progress made in the pursuit of gen­der equality in the European Union and individual Member States over time. Moreover, the present update makes a first attempt at populating the satellite domain of violence by providing a composite indicator of direct violence against women, based on the data on violence against women collected by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights through the EU-wide Survey on Violence against Women. The results of the Gender Equality Index show that there have been visible, albeit marginal, improvements between 2005 and 2012 in the domains covered by the Gender Equality Index. With an overall score of 52.9 out of 100 in 2012, the EU remains only halfway towards equality, having risen from 51.3 in 2005. Progress needs to increase its pace if the EU is to fulfil its ambitions and meet the Europe 2020 targets." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: Männer; Frauen; Gleichstellung - internationaler Vergleich; Gleichstellung - Indikatoren; soziale Indikatoren; sozialer Status; Bildungschancengleichheit; Arbeitsmarktchancen; Chancengleichheit; soziale Ungleichheit; Gleichstellungspolitik - Erfolgskontrolle; politische Partizipation; Mitbestimmung; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2005; E 2012}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k160720r15}, } @Book{Humphreys:1986:WAP, Annote= {Sign.: 90-206.0796;}, Institution={Institute of Public Administration, Dublin (Hrsg.)}, Author= {Peter C. Humphreys}, Title= {Worksharing and the public sector}, Year= {1986}, Pages= {239}, Address= {Dublin}, ISBN= {ISBN 0-906980-69-0}, Abstract= {"This report contains the findings of a research study, begun in 1984, which was commissioned through the Committee for Administrative Research (CAR) by the Department of the Public Service (DPS). It was undertaken in the Research Division of the Institute of Public Administration (IPA). In many respects, this present report has its origins in an earlier study (see Humphreys 1983). Public Service Employment examines Irish and international experiences of 'worksharing', as only one of a range of actual and potential strategies (including permanent and temporary job provision, the relocation of employment and so on), which could be used by Irish public sector employers to help them adapt to changing patterns of employment and, in particular, the challenge presented by high unemployment. However, because of its broad brief, ist was only possible to provide an overview of developments up to that time. The study concluded that 'in the light of the Irish employment situation, it would foolish not to thoroughly explore the potential for worksharing in the Public Service as elsewhere, because it is only with the more detailed investigation of particular projects, including practical experiments, that a more substantive evaluation can be achieved' (Humpreys 1983, p. 280). The present report seeks to contribute to a more substantive evaluation." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))}, Annote= {Schlagwörter: öffentlicher Dienst; staatlicher Sektor; work sharing; Arbeitszeitentwicklung; Arbeitszeitverkürzung; Jahresarbeitszeit; Lebensarbeitszeit; Wochenarbeitszeit; Teilzeitarbeit; Arbeitszeitverteilung; Umverteilung; Irland; Europäische Union; Belgien; Dänemark; Frankreich; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Italien; Luxemburg; Niederlande; Großbritannien; USA; }, Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1970; E 1984}, Annote= {Sprache: en}, Annote= {IAB-Sign.: 90-206.0796}, Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, i870318f10}, } 19 von 928 Datensätzen ausgegeben.