Suchprofil: Gender_wage_gap
Durchsuchter Fertigstellungsmonat: 11/14

Sortierung:
1. SSCI-JOURNALS
2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN
3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN
4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER
5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR
6. BEITRÄGE ZU SAMMELWERKEN


****************
1. SSCI-JOURNALS
****************

%0 Journal Article
%J ILR Review
%V 30
%N 2
%F Z 680
%A Aigner, Dennis J.
%A Cain, Glen G.
%T Statistical theories of discrimination in labor markets
%D 1977
%P S. 175-187
%G en
%@ ISSN 0019-7939
%R 10.2307/2522871
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2522871
%X "Economic discrimination has been difficult to explain by means of standard neoclassical economic models that assume pervasive competition. Why, after all, should two groups of workers who have the same productivity receive different remuneration? The challenge to explain this phenomenon is posed most sharply by the marked differentials in wages and earnings between blacks and whites and between men and women differentials that remain substantial despite diligent efforts to control for supply-side productivity traits. This paper examines that issue from a perspective suggested by Kenneth Arrow, John J. McCall, Edmund S. Phelps, Melvin W. Reder, and A. Michael Spence, all of whom focused on certain implications of employer uncertainty about the productivity of racial (or sex) groups of workers, particularly in the context of hiring and placement decisions., This paper offers several models that clarify the meaning of economic 'statistical discrimination,' simplify the theory, and yield plausible empirical implications. On the other hand, the paper also identifies several shortcomings of 'statistical discrimination' models; shows that the often-cited Phelps model does not constitute economic discrimination, statistical or otherwise; and concludes that these models probably do not explain most labor market discrimination." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
%K Arbeitsmarkttheorie
%K Diskriminierung
%K Statistik
%K Lohndiskriminierung
%K Farbige
%K erwerbstätige Frauen
%Z Typ: 1. SSCI-Journals
%Z fertig: 2014-11-06
%M k141014v07
%~ LitDokAB
%W IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek




**********************************
4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER
**********************************

%0 Book
%1 National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (Hrsg.)
%A Guvenen, Fatih
%A Kaplan, Greg
%A Song, Jae
%T The glass ceiling and the paper floor : gender differences among top earners, 1981-2012
%D 2014
%P 41 S.
%C Cambrige, Mass.
%G en
%# A 1981; E 2012
%B NBER working paper : 20560
%U http://www.nber.org/papers/w20560
%X "We analyze changes in the gender structure at the top of the earnings distribution in the United States over the last 30 years using a 10% sample of individual earnings histories from the Social Security Administration. Despite making large inroads, females still constitute a small proportion of the top percentiles: the glass ceiling, albeit a thinner one, remains. We measure the contribution of changes in labor force participation, changes in the persistence of top earnings, and changes in industry and age composition to the change in the gender composition of top earners. A large proportion of the increased share of females among top earners is accounted for by the mending of, what we refer to as, the paper floor - the phenomenon whereby female top earners were much more likely than male top earners to drop out of the top percentiles. We also provide new evidence at the top of the earnings distribution for both genders: the rising share of top earnings accruing to workers in the Finance and Insurance industry, the relative transitory status of top earners, the emergence of top earnings gender gaps over the life cycle, and gender differences among lifetime top earners." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
%K Führungskräfte
%K geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren
%K beruflicher Aufstieg
%K Geschlechterverteilung
%K Mobilitätsbarriere
%K beruflicher Abstieg
%K Berufsverlauf
%K erwerbstätige Frauen
%K erwerbstätige Männer
%K Lohnunterschied
%K Lebenslauf
%K Lebenseinkommen
%K Einkommensunterschied
%K USA
%K E24
%K E25
%K J31
%Z Typ: 4. Arbeitspapiere/Discussion Paper
%Z fertig: 2014-11-26
%M k141010r06
%~ LitDokAB
%W IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek


%0 Book
%1 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Bonn (Hrsg.)
%A Liu, Xing Michelle
%A Sierminska, Eva
%T Evaluating the effect of beauty on labor market outcomes : a review of the literature
%D 2014
%P 26 S.
%C Bonn
%G en
%B IZA discussion paper : 8526
%U http://doku.iab.de/externe/2014/k141010r04.pdf
%X "An important underlying determinant of wage discrimination, as well as the gender wage gap is the way the labor market rewards individual physical attractiveness. This article surveys the extensive empirical literature of the effect of physical attractiveness on labor market outcomes. Particular attention is given to the channels through which attractiveness may affect individual labor market outcomes and the way attractiveness affects gender wage differentials. Further research is needed on the effect of attractiveness within occupations in order to provide more evidence on its productivity-enhancing channel of transmission and the effect this has on the gender wage gap." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
%K physiologische Faktoren
%K Beschäftigungseffekte
%K geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren
%K Persönlichkeitsmerkmale
%K Lohndiskriminierung
%K Einkommenseffekte - internationaler Vergleich
%K Lohnunterschied
%K Stereotyp
%K Arbeitsproduktivität
%K Personalauswahl
%K Berufswahl
%K Wahrnehmung
%K Kanada
%K USA
%K Großbritannien
%K Niederlande
%K China
%K Brasilien
%K Bundesrepublik Deutschland
%K Luxemburg
%K Australien
%K J71
%K J31
%K J2
%K J16
%Z Typ: 4. Arbeitspapiere/Discussion Paper
%Z fertig: 2014-11-26
%M k141010r04
%~ LitDokAB
%W IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek


%0 Book
%1 Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Bonn (Hrsg.)
%A McGee, Andrew
%A McGee, Peter
%A Pan, Jessica
%T Performance pay, competitiveness, and the gender wage gap : evidence from the United States
%D 2014
%P 11 S.
%C Bonn
%G en
%# A 1988; E 2011
%B IZA discussion paper : 8563
%U http://doku.iab.de/externe/2014/k141106r14.pdf
%X "Evidence that women are less likely to opt into competitive compensation schemes in the laboratory has generated speculation that a gender difference in competitiveness contributes to the gender wage gap. Using data from the NLSY79 and NLSY97, we show that women are less likely to be employed in jobs using competitive compensation. The portion of the gender wage gap explained by gender segregation in compensation schemes is small in the NLSY79 but somewhat larger in the NLSY97 - suggesting an increasing role for competitiveness in explaining the gender wage gap." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))
%K Leistungslohn
%K Lohnunterschied
%K geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren
%K Wettbewerbsfähigkeit
%K erwerbstätige Frauen
%K erwerbstätige Männer
%K Lohnstruktur
%K USA
%K J16
%K A12
%Z Typ: 4. Arbeitspapiere/Discussion Paper
%Z fertig: 2014-11-21
%M k141106r14
%~ LitDokAB
%W IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek



4 von 342 Datensätzen ausgegeben.