Suchprofil: Gender_wage_gap
Durchsuchter Fertigstellungsmonat: 08/20
Sortierung:
1. SSCI-JOURNALS
2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN
3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN
4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER
5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR
6. BEITRÄGE ZU SAMMELWERKEN
****************
1. SSCI-JOURNALS
****************
@Article{Smith:2020:POW,
Journal= {Journal of vocational behavior},
Volume= {118},
Author= {Rachel Williamson Smith and Lisa E. Baranik and Ryan D. Duffy},
Title= {Psychological ownership within psychology of working theory: A three-wave study of gender and sexual minority employees},
Year= {2020},
Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103374},
Abstract= {"The present study examines the experiences of gender and sexual minority employees regarding their ability to secure decent work. Specifically, we extend psychology of working theory (PWT) by integrating social identity theory and incorporating psychological ownership into the model. We tested our hypotheses in a sample of 240 gender and sexual minority employees gathering data at three time points over a two-week period. Financial strain, work volition, and psychological ownership were all found to directly predict decent work and work volition was found to mediate the effects of financial strain and workplace climate to decent work. Although climate was significantly predicted by psychological ownership, it failed to mediate the climate-decent work relation, highlighting the need for future research to examine additional constructs in and refinement of PWT. We offer suggestions for future research on PWT and the experiences of marginalized employees, particularly gender and sexual minority employees." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku, © 2020 Elsevier) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitspsychologie; menschengerechte Arbeit; Homosexualität; Minderheiten; Geschlecht; Betriebsklima; soziale Identität; Arbeitsplatzqualität; ökonomische Faktoren; Lohnunterschied; Selbstverantwortung; berufliche Identität; Marginalität; Diskriminierung; USA; },
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 605},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K200807CHN},
}
@Article{Witte:2020:IOL,
Journal= {European Sociological Review},
Volume= {36},
Number= {3},
Author= {Nils Witte and Andreas Haupt},
Title= {Is Occupational Licensing More Beneficial for Women than for Men? The Case of Germany, 1993/2015},
Year= {2020},
Pages= {429-441},
Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz060},
Abstract= {"This article analyzes the relation of gender wage inequality to occupational licensing in Germany in 1993 and 2015. We show that the very particular German licensing system and strong gender segregation lead to an overrepresentation of women in licensed occupations. We further investigate, whether both genders benefit equally from licensing in terms of wages. Finally, we study whether both women's overrepresentation and potential gender gaps within licensed occupations help to explain patterns in the overall gender wage gap. To this end, we distinguish licensed occupations in professions and semi-professions. We use 1993 and 2015 waves of the German Socio-Economic Panel Study to apply repeated cross-sectional regressions and decompositions. Our findings suggest that women benefited more from licensing in 1993 than in 2015. Men's wage premiums seem to increase over time, but women's premiums do not. We also show that semi-professions are less rewarding and women are overrepresented in these occupations. Finally, increased demand for licensed occupations is an important contribution to narrowing the gender wage gap. Women's increased employment in licensed occupations alone would have reduced the overall gender wage gap by roughly 8 per cent." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Berufsgruppe; Zugangsvoraussetzung; Lizenz; Auswirkungen; Lohnunterschied; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Frauen; Männer; Frauenberufe; Männerberufe; Einkommenseffekte; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 1993-2015},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 863},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K200806CGJ},
}
*************************
3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN
*************************
@Article{Koebe:2020:SAD,
Journal= {DIW aktuell},
Number= {46},
Author= {Josefine Koebe and Claire Samtleben and Annekatrin Schrenker and Aline Zucco},
Title= {Systemrelevant, aber dennoch kaum anerkannt: Entlohnung unverzichtbarer Berufe in der Corona-Krise unterdurchschnittlich},
Year= {2020},
Pages= {1-9},
Annote= {URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/diw/diwakt/48de.html},
Annote= {URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/diw/diwakt/48de.html},
Abstract= {"In Zeiten der Corona-Krise zeigt sich: Bestimmte Berufsgruppen und Bereiche des öffentlichen und sozialen Lebens sind systemrelevant. 1 Die Mehrheit der als systemrelevant definierten Berufe weist jedoch außerhalb von Krisenzeiten ein geringes gesellschaftliches Ansehen und eine unterdurchschnittliche Bezahlung auf. Der Frauenanteil ist hingegen überdurchschnittlich. Dies gilt vor allem für die systemrelevanten Berufe der 'ersten Stunde', also jene Tätigkeiten, die seit Beginn der Corona-Krise als systemrelevant gelten. Die Liste systemrelevanter Berufe wurde über die Zeit konkretisiert und um weitere Berufsgruppen ergänzt. Diese zusätzlichen Berufe haben ein höheres Lohn- und Prestigeniveau und einen höheren Männeranteil. Dennoch gilt auch nach der erweiterten Definition der systemrelevanten Berufe 'zweiter Stunde': Die Diskrepanz zwischen gesellschaftlicher Unverzichtbarkeit und tatsächlicher Entlohnung ist in Krisenzeiten besonders offensichtlich. Deshalb sollten auf kollektive Dankbarkeit konkrete Maßnahmen folgen, wie eine höhere Entlohnung und eine breitere tarifvertragliche Absicherung." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Pandemie; Krisenmanagement; Frauenberufe; Lohnunterschied; Männerberufe; soziale Anerkennung; Berufsprestige; Auswirkungen; Berufsgruppe; Lohnhöhe; Arbeitsbedingungen; Einkommenseffekte; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2013-2020},
Annote= {Sprache: de},
Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 2286},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K200727CDF},
}
@Article{Mueller:2020:GOI,
Journal= {Sozialer Fortschritt},
Volume= {69},
Number= {06/07},
Author= {Dana M{\"u}ller and Michaela Fuchs},
Title= {Geschlechtsspezifische Ost-West-Unterschiede im Erwerbsverlauf},
Year= {2020},
Pages= {445-466},
Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/sfo.69.6-7.445},
Abstract= {"Dieser Beitrag beschreibt die Entwicklung geschlechtsspezifischer Ungleichheiten über die letzten drei Jahrzehnte in Ost- und Westdeutschland. Unterschiede zwischen beiden Regionen bestehen nach wie vor. Sie haben ihren Ursprung in den verschiedenen gesellschaftlichen Ansätzen der Gleichstellung der Geschlechter vor der Wiedervereinigung und den unterschiedlichen strukturellen Gegebenheiten am Arbeitsmarkt. Dennoch besitzen nach wie vor weder die Frauen in Westdeutschland noch in Ostdeutschland die gleichen Einkommens- und Karrierechancen wie Männer. Die Bemühungen des Staates, den Abbau geschlechtsspezifischer Ungleichheiten voranzutreiben, werden anhand der zahlreichen Maßnahmen der letzten Jahre sichtbar. Sie reichen aber noch nicht aus, wie die Zahlen im Beitrag zeigen." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)},
Abstract= {"This article describes the development of gender inequalities over the last three decades in East and West Germany. There are still differences between the two regions. They have their origin in the different social concepts to gender equality before reunification and the different structural conditions on the labour market. Nevertheless, not only women in West Germany but also in East Germany still do not have the same income and career opportunities as men. The state's efforts to promote the reduction of gender-specific inequalities are evident from the numerous measures taken in recent years. However, they are not yet sufficient." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Berufsverlauf; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Männer; Frauen; regionaler Vergleich; kulturelle Faktoren; Gleichstellung; Lohnunterschied; Frauenerwerbstätigkeit; staatlicher Zusammenschluss; Auswirkungen; Arbeitsteilung; Erwerbsquote; Erwerbsbeteiligung; geschlechtsspezifischer Arbeitsmarkt; Segregation; Mütter; Erwerbsunterbrechung; Dauer; Berufsausstieg; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Ostdeutschland; Westdeutschland; DDR; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 1991-2019},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: D10 ; J10 ; J16 ; P20 ; P50},
Annote= {Sprache: de},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K200617BYY},
}
@Article{Nisic:2017:SDI,
Journal= {European Sociological Review},
Volume= {33},
Number= {2},
Author= {Natascha Nisic},
Title= {Smaller differences in bigger cities? : Assessing the regional dimension of the gender pay gap},
Year= {2017},
Pages= {292-304},
Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcx037},
Abstract= {"Although structural determinants have been emphasized for explaining wage differences between men and women, the role of regional opportunity structures still warrants research. This investigation focuses on the relevance of urban labour markets and agglomeration effects for the spatial variation in the gender wage gap and provides comprehensive insights into the underlying mechanisms by combining sociological, economic, and geographical approaches. It is argued that partnership ties impose severe restrictions on women's labour mobility, confining them to the labour markets of their partners and the local conditions of their residential area. According to labour market theory, women's lower responsiveness to better job offers will translate into lower earnings. However, the size of the wage penalty varies with urban size and will be considerably lower in large labour markets. Empirical evidence is provided using data from the German Socio-economic Panel (1992 - 2012). Methodologically, the study adds to the literature by estimating hybrid, within- and between-effect wage regressions that also take into account dynamic selection into employment. Results indicate that male - female wage differentials narrow with urban size up to 9 per cent, thereby prompting the increasingly discussed importance of agglomeration effects for women's employment outcomes. Moreover, the study reveals and discusses pitfalls in interpreting results from fixed-effects models." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Lohnunterschied; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; erwerbstätige Frauen; erwerbstätige Männer; regionale Faktoren; regionaler Vergleich; Ortsgröße; Auswirkungen; Partnerschaft; regionale Mobilität; Mobilitätsbarriere; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 1992-2012},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k170515303},
}
**********************************
4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER
**********************************
@Book{Aksoy:2020:RAG,
Institution={Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Cevat Giray Aksoy and Berkay Ozcan and Julia Philipp},
Title= {Robots and the Gender Pay Gap in Europe},
Year= {2020},
Pages= {48},
Series= {IZA discussion paper},
Number= {13482},
Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rxkg2},
Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rxkg2},
Abstract= {"Could robotization make the gender pay gap worse? We provide the first large-scale evidence on the impact of industrial robots on the gender pay gap using data from 20 European countries. We show that robot adoption increases both male and female earnings but also increases the gender pay gap. Using an instrumental variable strategy, we find that a ten percent increase in robotization leads to a 1.8 percent increase in the gender pay gap. These results are mainly driven by countries with high levels of gender inequality and outsourcing destination countries. We then explore the mechanisms behind this effect and find that our results can be explained by the fact that men at medium- and high-skill occupations disproportionately benefit from robotization (through a productivity effect). We rule out the possibility that our results are driven by mechanical changes in the gender composition of the workforce nor by inflows or outflows from the manufacturing sector." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Industrieroboter; Einkommenseffekte; Lohnentwicklung; Lohnunterschied; erwerbstätige Frauen; erwerbstätige Männer; Qualifikationsniveau; technische Entwicklung; Qualifizierung; Dequalifizierung; internationaler Vergleich; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Italien; Schweden; Belgien; Tschechische Republik; Slowakei; Finnland; Spanien; Frankreich; Niederlande; Ungarn; Portugal; Großbritannien; Polen; Rumänien; Estland; Griechenland; Bulgarien; Litauen; Lettland; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2006-2014},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J00 ; J71 ; J31},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K200716CAV},
}
@Book{Bonaccolto:2020:BWP,
Institution={Labor and Socio-Economic Research Center (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Giovanni Bonaccolto and Marina T{\"o}pfer},
Title= {Black-Swan Wage Premiums? Evidence from Expectile Regression},
Year= {2020},
Pages= {46},
Address= {Erlangen},
Series= {LASER discussion paper},
Number= {120},
Annote= {URL: http://www.laser.uni-erlangen.de/papers/paper/352.pdf},
Abstract= {"We estimate wage premiums (male, union member and public sector) in West Germany using post penalized expectile regression. The estimation relies on data from the Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) 2010-2017. We use a double robust LASSO as penalization technique, which allows us to deal with potential omitted variable bias and to conduct expectile-specific model selection. In addition, we enrich our study by comparing our estimates with the ones derived from a competing approach: the quantile regression method. We find that, depending on the underlying estimation method (expectile or quantile regression), the estimated wage premiums may differ substantially. Particularly, the premiums in the tails exhibit stronger sensitivity to the estimation method. The analysis detects 'black-swan' wage premiums, i.e. significant premiums not uncovered otherwise." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Männer; Gewerkschaftszugehörigkeit; Lohnhöhe; öffentlicher Dienst; Lohnunterschied; Einkommenseffekte; Privatwirtschaft; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Frauen; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Westdeutschland; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2000-2017},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K200812CJ0},
}
@Book{Briel:2020:OAG,
Institution={Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Stephanie Briel and Aderonke Osikominu and Gregor Pfeifer and Mirjam Reutter and Sascha Satlukal},
Title= {Overconfidence and Gender Differences in Wage Expectations},
Year= {2020},
Pages= {42},
Series= {IZA discussion paper},
Number= {13517},
Annote= {URL: http://ftp.iza.org/dp13517.pdf},
Abstract= {"We analyze the impact of (over-)confidence on gender differences in expected starting salaries using elicited beliefs of prospective university students in Germany. According to our results, female students have lower wage expectations and are less overconfident than their male counterparts. Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions of the mean show that 7.7% of the gender gap in wage expectations is attributable to a higher overconfidence of males. Decompositions of the unconditional quantiles of expected salaries suggest that the contribution of gender differences in confidence to the gender gap is particularly strong at the bottom and top of the wage expectation distribution." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Lohnunterschied; Erwartung; Einkommenserwartung; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Studenten; Studienfach; Studienfachwahl; Studienabschluss; Männer; Frauen; Akademiker; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Saarland; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 2011-2012},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: C21 ; J16 ; D84 ; D91},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K200730CET},
}
@Book{Hamermesh:2017:LMI,
Institution={Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Daniel S. Hamermesh},
Title= {The labor market in the US, 2000-2016 : recovery from the Great Recession is essentially complete, but there are difficult unemployment and wage issues},
Year= {2017},
Pages= {12},
Address= {Bonn},
Series= {IZA world of labor},
Number= {361},
Annote= {URL: https://wol.iza.org/uploads/articles/361/pdfs/the-labor-market-in-the-us-2000-2016.pdf?v=1},
Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.361},
Abstract= {"As the largest economy in the world, the US labor market is crucial to the economic well-being of citizens worldwide as well as, of course, that of its own citizens. Since 2000 the US labor market has undergone substantial changes, both reflecting the Great Recession, but also resulting from some striking trends. Most interesting have been a remarkable drop in the labor force participation rate, reversing a nearly 50-year trend; the nearly full recovery of unemployment from the depths of the Great Recession; and the little-known continuing growth in post-inflation average earnings." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsmarktentwicklung; Arbeitslosigkeitsentwicklung; Lohnentwicklung; Erwerbsbeteiligung; Entwicklung; Männer; Frauen; Jugendarbeitslosigkeit; Langzeitarbeitslosigkeit; offene Stellen; Farbige; Weiße; Lohnunterschied; USA; },
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k170505r06},
}
@Book{Minkus:2019:LMC,
Institution={Deutsches Institut f{\"u}r Wirtschaftsforschung (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Lara Minkus},
Title= {Labor market closure and the stalling of the gender pay gap},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {34},
Address= {Berlin},
Series= {SOEPpapers on multidisciplinary panel data research at DIW Berlin},
Number= {1049},
Annote= {URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.673563.de/diw_sp1049.pdf},
Abstract= {"The gender pay gap (GPG) remains a persistent phenomenon in contemporary labor markets. Despite a vast body of research examining its causes, as of today, unequal labor market power resources between men and women have remained an underappreciated factor in the literature. Drawing on the Socio-economic Panel and the Microcensus, the association between the GPG and labor market closure - a crucial determinant of unequal power resources in labor markets - is followed from 1993-2011. Employing JMP decomposition, unionization, tertiary credentialing and part-time employment are found to exacerbate the overall wage differential by 41 percent. Part-time employment has been the only indictor that enlarged the gender pay gap (17 percent) between 1993 and 2011, while the remaining covariates contributed toward its convergence. These results advance our understanding of stalling GPGs by highlighting the so far widely neglected importance of power resources on the GPG." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Lohnunterschied; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Erwerbsbeteiligung; Humankapital; Frauen; erwerbstätige Frauen; Teilzeitarbeit; Teilzeitarbeitnehmer; Berufserfahrung; Beschäftigungsdauer; Bildungsniveau; Gewerkschaftszugehörigkeit; Arbeitsmarktsegmentation; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: 1993-2011},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J20 ; J50 ; L10},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k190830r02},
}
***************************
5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR
***************************
@Book{Averett:2018:OHW,
Editor= {Susan L. Averett and Laura M. Argys and Saul D. Hoffman},
Title= {The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy},
Year= {2018},
Pages= {876},
Address= {Oxford},
Publisher= {Oxford University Press},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-0-19-062896-3},
Annote= {URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190628963.001.0001},
Abstract= {"The transformation of women's lives over the past century is among the most significant and far-reaching of social and economic phenomena, affecting not only women but also their partners, children, and indeed nearly every person on the planet. In developed and developing countries alike, women are acquiring more education, marrying later, having fewer children, and spending a far greater amount of their adult lives in the labor force. Yet, because women remain the primary caregivers of children, issues such as work-life balance and the glass ceiling have given rise to critical policy discussions in the developed world. In developing countries, many women lack access to reproductive technology and are often relegated to jobs in the informal sector, where pay is variable and job security is weak. Considerable occupational segregation and stubborn gender pay gaps persist around the world. The Oxford Handbook of Women and the Economy is the first comprehensive collection of scholarly essays to address these issues using the powerful framework of economics. Each chapter, written by an acknowledged expert or team of experts, reviews the key trends, surveys the relevant economic theory, and summarizes and critiques the empirical research literature. By providing a clear-eyed view of what we know, what we do not know, and what the critical unanswered questions are, this Handbook provides an invaluable and wide-ranging examination of the many changes that have occurred in women's economic lives." (Publisher information, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Frauen; sozialer Wandel; ökonomische Faktoren; Eheschließung; Fruchtbarkeit; berufliche Integration; Frauenerwerbstätigkeit; Familienpolitik; Feminismus; ökonomische Theorie; Ehescheidung; Frauenberufe; geschlechtsspezifischer Arbeitsmarkt; Segregation; beruflicher Aufstieg; Mobilitätsbarriere; Lohnunterschied; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; MINT-Berufe; Entwicklungsländer; Industrieländer; Beruf und Familie; Führungskräfte; Sterblichkeit; Lebenserwartung; Arbeitsteilung; Altenpflege; Kinderbetreuung; Sozialgeschichte; internationale Migration; Wohnungslosigkeit; USA; },
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, K200728CD5},
}
11 von 408 Datensätzen ausgegeben.