Suchprofil: EU-Arbeitsmarkt,_-Integration
Durchsuchter Fertigstellungsmonat: 11/19
Sortierung:
1. SSCI-JOURNALS
2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN
3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN
4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER
5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR
6. BEITRÄGE ZU SAMMELWERKEN
****************
1. SSCI-JOURNALS
****************
@Article{Dossche:2019:EHA,
Journal= {Journal of monetary economics},
Volume= {104},
Number= {June},
Author= {Maarten Dossche and Vivien Lewis and Céline Poilly},
Title= {Employment, hours and the welfare effects of intra-firm bargaining},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {67-84},
ISBN= {ISSN 0304-3932},
Abstract= {"Bilateral bargaining between a multiple-worker firm and individual employees leads to overhiring. With a concave production function, the firm can reduce the marginal product by hiring an additional worker, thereby reducing the bargaining wage paid to all existing employees. We show that this externality is amplified when firms can adjust hours per worker as well as employment. Firms keep down workers' wage demands by reducing the number of hours per worker and the resulting labor disutility. Our finding is particularly relevant for European economies where hours adjustment plays an important role." (Author's abstract, © 2018 Elsevier) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Personalanpassung; Beschäftigerverhalten; individuelle Arbeitszeit; interner Arbeitsmarkt; Lohnfindung; Individualisierung; Tarifverhandlungen; Arbeitszeitflexibilität; Personaleinstellung; Arbeitsmarktmodell; Geldpolitik - Optimierung; Eurozone; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1999; E 2015},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: D62; E24; E61; E64; H21},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 2108},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191114v20},
}
@Article{Zwickl:2016:WFS,
Journal= {Ecological economics},
Volume= {121},
Author= {Klara Zwickl and Franziska Disslbacher and Sigrid Stagl},
Title= {Work-sharing for a sustainable economy},
Year= {2016},
Pages= {246-253},
ISBN= {ISSN 0921-8009},
Abstract= {"Achieving low unemployment in an environment of weak growth is a major policy challenge; a more egalitarian distribution of hours worked could be the key to solving it. Whether work-sharing actually increases employment, however, has been debated controversially. In this article we present stylized facts on the distribution of hours worked and discuss the role of work-sharing for a sustainable economy. Building on recent developments in labor market theory we review the determinants of working long hours and its effect on well-being. Finally, we survey work-sharing reforms in the past. While there seems to be a consensus that work-sharing in the Great Depression in the U.S. and in the Great Recession in Europe was successful in reducing employment losses, perceptions of the work-sharing reforms implemented between the 1980s and early 2000s are more ambivalent. However, even the most critical evaluations of these reforms provide no credible evidence of negative employment effects; instead, the overall success of the policy seems to depend on the economic and institutional setting, as well as the specific details of its implementation." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsmarktentwicklung; nachhaltige Entwicklung; work sharing; Beschäftigungseffekte; Reformpolitik; ökonomische Faktoren; institutionelle Faktoren; Rezession; Arbeitszeitentwicklung; Arbeitsverteilung; Überstunden - Auswirkungen; Lebenssituation - Zufriedenheit; Arbeitszufriedenheit; Arbeitsmarkttheorie; Industrieländer; OECD; Europäische Union; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1929; E 2013},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: D1; D3; E24; J08; J2},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {IAB-Sign.: X 010},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191030v05},
}
************************************
2. SONSTIGE REFERIERTE ZEITSCHRIFTEN
************************************
@Article{Wagner:2019:EAU,
Journal= {WISO},
Volume= {42},
Number= {3},
Author= {Bettina Wagner},
Title= {Europ{\"a}ische Arbeitsbeh{\"o}rde und Reform der EU-Entsenderichtlinie - Wirksame Instrumente zur grenz{\"u}berschreitenden Bek{\"a}mpfung von Lohn- und Sozialdumping?},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {11-25},
ISBN= {ISSN 1012-3059},
Abstract= {"Dieser Beitrag widmet sich der Einführung der Europäischen Arbeitsbehörde sowie der Reform der Entsenderichtlinie und analysiert diese Maßnahmen in Hinblick auf ihre Wirksamkeit in der Bekämpfung von Sozialdumping. In der EU ansässige Firmen haben das Recht, grenzübergreifend Dienstleistungen anzubieten und zur Ausführung der Tätigkeiten eigene Arbeitnehmer/-innen zu entsenden. Diese Freiheiten werden seit vielen Jahren intensiv, aber nicht immer nur zum Vorteil der betroffenen Arbeitnehmer/-innen angewandt und wurden seitdem durch eine Vielzahl von Richtlinien und Verordnungen ausgelegt und erweitert. Die Spannungsfelder und Interessenkonflikte, die sich zwischen den Akteuren/-innen auftun und wie diese innerhalb einer ständig wachsenden Europäischen Union verhandelt werden und werden sollten, ist ein weiterer Schwerpunkt dieses Beitrags" (Autorenreferat, © ISW-Linz)},
Abstract= {"his paper addresses the introduction of the European Labour Authority and the reform of the European Directive concerning the posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services and analyzes these measures in terms of their effectiveness in combating social dumping. Companies based in the EU have the right to offer services across borders and to send their own workers to carry them out. These freedoms have been used intensively for many years - not always to an advantage for workers and employees - and have since been interpreted and expanded through a variety of directives and regulations. The areas of conflict and conflicts of interest that arise between the activists, stateholders and nations and how they are and should be dealt with within an ever-growing European Union is the second focus of this article." (Author's abstract, © ISW-Linz) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitnehmerentsendegesetz; EU-Recht; Reformpolitik; EU-Bürger; Freizügigkeit; Arbeitsmigration; politische Einstellungen; Sozialversicherung; europäische Integration; Regulierung; Lohndiskriminierung; Europäische Union; EU-Staat; },
Annote= {Sprache: de},
Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 951},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191031v05},
}
*************************
3. SONSTIGE ZEITSCHRIFTEN
*************************
@Article{Bossler:2019:MBF,
Journal= {Wirtschaftsdienst},
Volume= {99},
Number= {10},
Author= {Mario Bossler and Johann Fuchs and Alexander Kubis and Lutz Schneider},
Title= {M{\"o}gliche Brexit-Folgen f{\"u}r den deutschen Arbeitsmarkt},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {687-692},
ISBN= {ISSN 0043-6275},
Abstract= {"Der Brexit wird auch den deutschen Arbeitsmarkt beeinflussen. Viele Betriebe in Deutschland produzieren für den Export nach Großbritannien. Künftige Handelshemmnisse könnten negative Auswirkungen auf den Personalbedarf in diesen Unternehmen haben. Auf der Angebotsseite wird der Brexit die innereuropäischen Migrationsströme beeinflussen. Eine restriktivere britische Immigrationspolitik könnte migrationswillige EU-Bürger dazu bringen, verstärkt nach Deutschland zu ziehen und damit das Arbeitsangebot zu erhöhen. Die Autoren schätzen die Größenordnung dieser Effekte ein. Es zeigt sich, dass die Folgen des EUAustritts auf beiden Seiten des deutschen Arbeitsmarktes moderat sein sollten." (Autorenreferat, © Springer-Verlag)},
Abstract= {"Brexit will undoubtedly affect the German labour market. Many German establishments produce for export to the United Kingdom (UK) and future trade barriers could reduce demand for their products and consequently, the labour demand of those establishments. On the labour supply side, Brexit will affect European migration flows. A more restrictive UK immigration policy could prompt EU citizens willing to migrate to choose to move to Germany instead, for example, thereby increasing the receiving country's labour supply. Our empirical analysis suggests only modest consequences due to Brexit on both sides of the German labour market." (Author's abstract, © Springer-Verlag) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: politische Unabhängigkeit - Auswirkungen; Beschäftigungseffekte; Export; Handelshemmnis; internationale Migration; EU-Bürger; Arbeitskräfteangebot; Arbeitskräftenachfrage; IAB-Stellenerhebung; IAB-Betriebspanel; Einwanderung; Großbritannien; Europäische Union; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2013; E 2018},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F16; F22; J21},
Annote= {Sprache: de},
Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 213},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k190930303},
}
**********************************
4. ARBEITSPAPIERE/DISCUSSION PAPER
**********************************
@Book{Benz:2019:OFP,
Institution={Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Abteilung Internationaler Dialog (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Benjamin Benz},
Title= {Ohne Fundament : Perspektiven verbindlicher EU-Mindeststandards f{\"u}r die Mindestsicherung},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {43},
Address= {Berlin},
Series= {Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. Politik f{\"u}r Europa},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-3-96250-434-2},
Annote= {URL: http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/id/ipa/15760.pdf},
Abstract= {"In kaum einem EU-Land schützen Mindestsicherungssysteme hinreichend gegen Armut. Europäische Mindeststandards lassen sich im sozialpolitischen Leistungsrecht am ehesten im Bereich der Mindestsicherung erreichen. Die Ausgestaltung eines EU-europäischen Rahmens für die Mindestsicherung in den Mitgliedstaaten kann an arbeitsmarkt-, armuts- und sozialpolitische Debatten, Erklärungen und ?Garantien? auf nationaler und europäischer Ebene anknüpfen. Neben rechtlichen Elementen und solchen ?weicher? politischer Steuerung sollte ein EU-europäischer Rahmen für die Mindestsicherung auch eine finanzielle Komponente vorsehen. Ein europäischer Rahmen für die Mindestsicherung in den Mitgliedstaaten hat auch eine internationale Dimension zur Verwirklichung der Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung der Vereinten Nationen." (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindesteinkommen; soziale Mindeststandards; EU-Recht; Armutsbekämpfung; europäische Integration; Menschenrechte; Europarat; Grundrechte; Methode der offenen Koordinierung; europäische Sozialpolitik; Entwicklungspotenzial; Sozialhilfe; Europäische Union; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1990; E 2008},
Annote= {Sprache: de},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191106r07},
}
@Book{Bratsberg:2019:ECI,
Institution={Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Bernt Bratsberg and Oddbjørn Raaum and Knut Røed},
Title= {Excess churn in integrated labor markets},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {37},
Address= {Bonn},
Series= {IZA discussion paper},
Number= {12697},
ISBN= {ISSN 2365-9793},
Annote= {URL: http://doku.iab.de/externe/2019/k191028v07.pdf},
Abstract= {"The common European labor market encourages worker mobility that enhances allocative efficiency, but certain institutional features may trigger inefficient migration. As a job in one of Europe's high-income countries typically also entails coverage in a generous welfare and social insurance system, migrants' reservation wages may lie below their opportunity cost of labor. This represents an externality because employers and migrant workers can pass some of their remuneration costs onto the welfare state. Once welfare benefit entitlement is secured, the reservation wage of the migrant worker is expected to rise, giving the firm an incentive to replace the worker with a new migrant willing to accept lower pay. This leads to excess churn - the reallocation of labor within firms simultaneously involving the flow of employees to unemployment insurance and the hiring of similar workers. Based on Norwegian data, we present evidence of high excess churn rates in firms with many workers from the new EU member states." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Einwanderung - Auswirkungen; Verdrängungseffekte; Inländer; Beschäftigungseffekte; Einkommenseffekte; europäische Integration; internationale Migration; EU-Bürger; institutionelle Faktoren; Sozialversicherung; Wohlfahrtsstaat; Einkommenserwartung; Einwanderer; ausländische Arbeitnehmer; Sozialleistungen; Leistungsanspruch; labour turnover; Norwegen; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2006; E 2016},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F22; D62; E24},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191028v07},
}
@Book{Chen:2018:IAP,
Institution={International Monetary Fund (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Tingyun Chen and Jean-Jacques Hallaert and Alexander Pitt and Haonan Qu and Maximilien Queyranne and Alaina Rhee and Anna Shabunina and Jérôme Vandenbussche and Irene Yackovlev},
Title= {Inequality and poverty across generations in the European Union},
Year= {2018},
Pages= {51},
Address= {Washington, DC},
Series= {IMF staff discussion note},
Number= {2018,01},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-1-4843-3844-5 ; ISSN 2617-6750},
Abstract= {"This SDN studies the evolution of inequality across age groups leading up to and since the global financial crisis, as well as implications for fiscal and labor policies. Europe's population is aging, child and youth poverty are rising, and income support systems are often better equipped to address old-age poverty than the challenges faced by poor children and/or unemployed youth today." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: soziale Ungleichheit; Armut; Intergenerationsmobilität - internationaler Vergleich; institutionelle Faktoren; Verteilungspolitik; Umverteilung; Arbeitsmarktpolitik; Einkommensverteilung; Steuerpolitik; Jugendliche; junge Erwachsene; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1991; E 2016},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: E24; H23; H53; H55; I32; I38; O15},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191111r03},
}
@Book{Engels:2019:WIW,
Institution={Europ{\"a}ische Kommission, Generaldirektion Wirtschaft und Finanzen (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Steven Engels and Monika Sherwood},
Title= {What if we all worked gigs in the cloud? The economic relevance of digital labour platforms},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {26},
Address= {Br{\"u}ssel},
Series= {European economy. Discussion paper},
Number= {099},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-79-77436-2 ; ISSN 2443-8022},
Abstract= {"This paper explores the increasing diffusion of digital labour platforms, i.e. online software which facilitates the interaction between buyers and sellers of paid labour services through matching algorithms and structured information exchange. Although the phenomenon itself has only recently started to develop, its prevalence is rapidly increasing. We illustrate the various forms digital labour platforms can take, frame the issues they raise in the broader debate on digitalisation and succinctly describe the various angles from which the Commission services have so far approached digital labour platforms in analytical and policy work. The paper also explores the impact the rapid growth of the considered platforms could potentially have on the wider economy and raises three sets of relevant economic policy questions, focusing on:
- the contribution of digital labour platforms to overall labour market functioning (including wages) and productivity;
- the possible impact of digital labour platforms on macro-economic aggregates such as GDP and total employment at EU and Member State level;
- the impact of the growing participation in the labour markets intermediated by online platforms on public finances." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Digitale Arbeitswelt - Typologie; Plattformökonomie; Marktanteil; Arbeitsmarktentwicklung; Wirtschaftszweige; Transaktionskosten; Allokation - Effizienz; online; Arbeitsmarktstruktur; Monopson; outsourcing; Makroökonomie; Volkswirtschaft; öffentlicher Haushalt; Europäische Union; },
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J01; E24},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v24},
}
@Book{Jara:2018:IPA,
Institution={University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research (Hrsg.); University of Cambridge, Faculty of Economics (Hrsg.)},
Author= {H. Xavier Jara and Alberto Tumino},
Title= {Income protection of atypical workers in the event of unemployment in Europe},
Year= {2018},
Pages= {32},
Address= {Cambridge},
Series= {EUROMOD working paper},
Number= {2018,18},
Annote= {URL: https://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/research/publications/working-papers/euromod/em18-18.pdf},
Abstract= {"This paper evaluates the degree of income protection the tax-benefit system provides to atypical workers in the event of unemployment, comparing them to standard employees. Our approach relies on EUROMOD, the EU tax-benefit microsimulation model, to simulate transitions from employment to unemployment for the entire workforce and to compare household financial circumstances before and after the transition. Our results show that coverage rates of unemployment insurance are low among atypical workers. These workers are also significantly more exposed to the risk of poverty than standard employees, both while in work and in the event of unemployment. Our analysis also shows that low-work intensity employees are characterised by higher net replacement rates than other groups. However, this is due to the major role played by the market incomes of other household members. Finally, we show that in countries where selfemployed workers are not eligible for unemployment insurance benefits, extending the eligibility to this group of workers would increase their replacement rates significantly and make them less likely to fall into poverty in the event of unemployment." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: atypische Beschäftigung - internationaler Vergleich; Arbeitslose; soziale Sicherheit; Arbeitslosenunterstützung; Leistungshöhe; Arbeitslosenversicherung; Leistungsanspruch; Selbständige; Europäisches Haushaltspanel; Beschäftigtenzahl; geringfügige Beschäftigung; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2014; E 2017},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: C81; H55; I3},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191031v28},
}
@Book{Kalyva:2018:LTA,
Institution={Europ{\"a}ische Kommission, Generaldirektion Wirtschaft und Finanzen (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Athena Kalyva and Savina Princen and Alexander Leodolter and Caterina Astarita},
Title= {Labour taxation and inclusive growth},
Year= {2018},
Pages= {69},
Address= {Br{\"u}ssel},
Series= {European economy. Discussion paper},
Number= {084},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-79-77421-8 ; ISSN 2443-8022},
Abstract= {"The importance of tackling income inequality has been stressed in the context of the European Pillar of Social Rights. In this context, the 2018 Annual Growth Survey underlined the relevance of labour taxes to pursue inclusive growth, as it has an important impact on economic growth but also on income inequality. Not all labour tax reforms, however, can simultaneously foster growth and reduce income inequality: some reforms imply a trade-off while others offer a win-win situation. This paper focusses on those labour tax reforms which offer complementarities between growth and income inequality objectives. It expands on work carried out for the Eurogroup (tax wedge, financing labour tax cuts) and the Economic Policy Committee (secondary earners, design of labour taxation) in supporting the EU political imperative of addressing income inequalities while fostering growth." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Lohnsteuer; Arbeit; Besteuerung; Steuerentlastung - internationaler Vergleich; Steuerreform; Wachstumspolitik; Wirtschaftswachstum; Einkommensverteilung; soziale Ungleichheit; Umverteilung; Steueraufkommen; Steuerbelastung; dual career couples; Arbeitskräfteangebot; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; OECD; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2015; E 2018},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: D1; D2; D3; E6; H2; H21; J08; J2},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v26},
}
@Book{Mandl:2019:PWM,
Institution={European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Irene Mandl},
Title= {Platform work: Maximising the potential while safeguarding standards? : Digital age},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {20},
Address= {Dublin},
Series= {Eurofound policy brief},
ISBN= {ISBN 78-92-897-1967-4 ; ISSN 2599-8153},
Abstract= {"Platform work emerged onto European labour markets about a decade ago. While still small in scale, it is growing and evolving into a variety of forms. Different types of platform work have significantly different effects on the employment and working conditions of the affiliated workers. To be effective, policy responses aimed at ensuring decent conditions in platform work should take these differences into consideration, rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach. This policy brief highlights the main opportunities and challenges of specific types of platform work and illustrates some of the first attempts at addressing them in the EU." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Plattformökonomie; Arbeitsbedingungen; prekäre Beschäftigung; Arbeitsmarktpolitik; Regulierung; Arbeitsrecht; Heterogenität; Beschäftigtenstruktur; Tätigkeitsfelder; Arbeitsmarktsegmentation; Arbeitsmarktchancen; soziale Sicherheit; Arbeitsschutz; Gesundheitsschutz; Arbeitsbeziehungen; Europäische Union; },
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191030r05},
}
@Book{Muñoz:2019:DET,
Institution={International Institute of Public Finance (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Mathilde Muñoz},
Title= {Do European top earners react to labour taxation through migration?},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {86},
Address= {M{\"u}nchen},
Series= {International Institute of Public Finance. Paper},
Annote= {URL: https://www.iipf.org/papers/MigrationMobility_V2.pdf},
Abstract= {"This paper studies the effects of top earnings tax rates on the mobility of top ten percent employees within Europe. I use a novel detailed micro-level dataset on mobility built from the largest European survey (EU-LFS), representative of the entire population of 28 European countries. My estimation strategy exploits the differential effects of changes in top income tax rates on individuals of different propensities to be treated by these changes. I find that top ten percent workers' location choices are significantly affected by top income tax rates. I estimate a rather low elasticity of the number of top earners with respect to net-of-tax rate that is between 0.1 and 0.3. By contrast, the mobility response to taxes is especially strong for foreigners, as I estimate an elasticity of the number of foreign top earners with respect to net-of-tax rate that is above one. Turning to tax policy implications, I uncover large heterogeneities within Europe, that translate into large differences in incentives to implement beggar-thy-neighbour policies across member states. These findings suggest that despite the overall moderate estimated mobility elasticity, tax competition entails substantial welfare costs." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Besteuerung - Auswirkungen; Hochqualifizierte; internationale Migration; Zielgebiet; Auswanderung - internationaler Vergleich; Erwerbseinkommen; regionale Mobilität; Mobilitätsbereitschaft; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; Schweiz; Norwegen; Island; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1998; E 2015},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191028r02},
}
@Book{Naguib:2019:EHI,
Institution={Universit{\"a}t St. Gallen, Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Costanza Naguib},
Title= {Estimating the heterogeneous impact of the free movement of persons on relative wage mobility},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {41},
Address= {Sankt Gallen},
Series= {Universit{\"a}t St. Gallen, Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung. Discussion paper},
Number= {2019-03},
Annote= {URL: http://ux-tauri.unisg.ch/RePEc/usg/econwp/EWP-1903.pdf},
Abstract= {"We analyse the impact of an inflow of foreign workers on positional wage mobility in a small open economy like Switzerland. We exploit the quasi-natural experiment constituted by the entry into force of the Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons between Switzerland and the EU on 1st June 2002. We compute conditional average treatment effects with machine learning methods, and we find evidence of relevant heterogeneity in the impact of this policy on wage mobility." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Freizügigkeit; Einkommenseffekte; Arbeitskräftemobilität; internationale Migration; Arbeitsmarkt; Arbeitsmarktpolitik; offene Gesellschaft; Lohnflexibilität; Lohnelastizität; Arbeitsmigration; ausländische Arbeitnehmer; institutionelle Faktoren; Inländer; Europäische Union; Schweiz; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2001; E 2004},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: C14; J31},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v18},
}
@Book{Raciborski:2019:IJS,
Institution={Europ{\"a}ische Kommission, Generaldirektion Wirtschaft und Finanzen (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Rafal Raciborski and Nicolas Robledo B{\"o}ttcher},
Title= {Incorporating a job search and matching module in the quest-model},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {37},
Address= {Br{\"u}ssel},
Series= {European economy. Discussion paper},
Number= {107},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-79-77444-7 ; ISSN 2443-8022},
Abstract= {"This paper documents a new Search & Matching extension of the basic version of QUEST, the European Commission Dynamic General Equilibrium model used for policy and historical business cycle analysis. The new module is suited for tracking labour market variables such as flows in and out of employment, vacancy rate and job separation rate. It hence is hoped to be useful for deepening the understanding of the processes driving the labour market dynamics including the role of crucial parameters such as the relative bargaining power of workers, replacement rate and the average cost of filling a vacancy. The paper provides a description of the extension, discusses its properties and potential uses and compares the results obtained with the extended version to those from the basic QUEST." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsmarktentwicklung; Konjunkturabhängigkeit; Konjunkturentwicklung; Simulation; Planungsmethode; Szenario; Arbeitsmarktgleichgewicht; Arbeitsmarktmodell; Europäische Union; },
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: E00; E32; J64},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v20},
}
@Book{Stierle:2018:HDR,
Institution={Europ{\"a}ische Kommission, Generaldirektion Wirtschaft und Finanzen (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Michael Stierle and Stierle-von Sch{\"u}tz Ulrike and Stijn Rocher},
Title= {How did regional economic structures in the EU change during the economic crisis?},
Year= {2018},
Pages= {56},
Address= {Br{\"u}ssel},
Series= {European economy. Discussion paper},
Number= {088},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-79-77425-6 ; ISSN 2443-8022},
Abstract= {"10 years on, many countries and regions in the EU still bear the scars of the 2008/2009 financial crisis. Countries and regions have recovered at different rates and undergone different structural changes. While the asymmetric impact of the crisis across regions and sectors has had a short-term impact on concentration and specialisation patterns; long-term forces, such as global economic and supply chain integration, continue to shape the economic landscape of European regions.
In our empirical analysis, we describe the development of regional economic structures in terms of sectoral employment and production (gross value added) during the crisis. We focus on the location pattern of sectors (concentration), i.e. in which regions economic activities in a sector tend to be located, and the specialisation of regions, i.e. which sectors are particularly important in a region.
Our analysis shows that the impact of the crisis on overall specialisation patterns appears rather limited, although some regions have been more affected than others. In addition, the general trend of sectoral location patterns in the EU becoming more similar over time has continued, albeit at a slower pace since 2009, especially in Central and East European Countries. In terms of sectors, employment and production concentration in the construction and manufacturing sectors, which displayed clustering before the crisis, have been dispersing since 2009. The data also show that regions with large employment losses during the crisis were mainly specialised in agriculture, low-tech manufacturing, construction and less-skilled services such as trade, accommodation/restaurants and transport. This suggests that local economic structures may have played a role in the economic resilience of regions during the crisis." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Wirtschaftsstruktur - internationaler Vergleich; Wirtschaftsstrukturwandel; regionale Faktoren; regionale Verteilung; regionale Disparität; regionales Cluster; Regionalforschung; Regionalökonomie; Kapitalkonzentration; Ballungsraum; Unternehmenskonzentration; Standortfaktoren; europäische Integration; Wirtschaftskrise; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2008; E 2013},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F02; F14; F21; L6; O57; P52; C43; F15; N60; R12},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v25},
}
@Book{Ulceluse:2019:LEM,
Institution={Global Labor Organization (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Magdalena Ulceluse},
Title= {The long-term effect of migration on economic inequality between EU Member States},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {24},
Address= {Maastricht},
Series= {GLO discussion paper},
Number= {383},
Abstract= {"This paper explores the long-term effect of migration on economic inequality between the 28 EU member states, covering the period 1995-2017. The cross-national, longitudinal analysis demonstrates that migration has had a positive and significant effect on development and economic growth in 28 member states. However, the findings also indicate that some countries have benefitted from migration more than others. Specifically, for countries experiencing positive net migration the effect is disproportionately larger than for countries experiencing negative net migration. This seems to indicate that, while migration has indeed contributed to economic development in all member states over the period analysed, it has not necessarily contributed to decreasing economic inequalities between them." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Einwanderung - Auswirkungen; Wirtschaftswachstum; Wirtschaftsentwicklung - internationaler Vergleich; Konvergenz; Heterogenität; Bruttoinlandsprodukt; Ungleichheit; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1995; E 2017},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: F220; O150; O47},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191106v26},
}
@Book{Vandeplas:2019:SMA,
Institution={Europ{\"a}ische Kommission, Generaldirektion Wirtschaft und Finanzen (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Anneleen Vandeplas and Anna Thum-Thysen},
Title= {Skills mismatch and productivity in the EU},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {75},
Address= {Br{\"u}ssel},
Series= {European economy. Discussion paper},
Number= {100},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-79-77437-9 ; ISSN 2443-8022},
Abstract= {"This paper analyses different dimensions of skills mismatch (notably 'macro-economic skills mismatch', 'skills shortages', and 'on-the-job skills mismatch') and their empirical relationship with labour productivity. Macro-economic skills mismatch arises when the skills distribution differs between the available workers and those that get hired. Skills shortages occur when employers encounter difficulties to fill their vacancies. On-the-job skills mismatch (overqualification or underqualification) refers to a discrepancy between the qualification level of a jobholder and the requirements for that particular job.
Our data suggest that certain types of skills mismatch are indeed on the rise in the EU, notably skills shortages and overqualification. Other types are on a long-term declining trend (e.g. underqualification) or follow more complex patterns over time (e.g. macro-economic skills mismatch). There are also significant differences across EU Member States in the levels of these indicators. We further suggest that theoretical predictions on the relationship between skills mismatch and productivity depend on the dimension of skills mismatch considered. Our empirical analysis suggests a negative relationship between macro-economic skill mismatch and labour productivity and - as a sign of a buoyant economy - a positive relationship between skills shortages and labour productivity. With regard to on-the-job skills mismatch, our data confirm earlier findings from the economic literature: when comparing a mismatched with a well-matched worker within the same occupation, overqualification raises and underqualification reduces productivity. When comparing a mismatched with a well-matched worker within the same qualification level, overqualification reduces and underqualification increases productivity.
Our results imply a positive link between skills supply and productivity. However, to realise the full potential of higher skills, skills should be labour market relevant and skilled workers need to be matched with jobs that use these skills. Therefore, upskilling policies should ideally be accompanied by policies that assure quality and labour market relevance of acquired skills, policies that foster a general upgrading of jobs such as business regulations allowing for firm entry, growth, sectoral reallocation, and policies supporting labour mobility and innovation." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Humankapital; Qualifikationsstruktur; mismatch; Qualifikationsanforderungen; Qualifikationsbedarf; qualifikationsspezifische Faktoren; Qualifikationswandel; Qualifikationsdefizit; Produktivitätseffekte - internationaler Vergleich; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2006; E 2018},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: D40; E31; L51},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191113v23},
}
@Book{Zwickl:2016:WFS,
Institution={WWWforEurope (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Klara Zwickl and Franziska Disslbacher and Sigrid Stagl},
Title= {Work-sharing for a sustainable economy},
Year= {2016},
Pages= {25},
Address= {Wien},
Series= {WWWforEurope WelfareWealthWork. Working paper},
Number= {111},
Annote= {URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/jart/prj3/wifo/resources/person_dokument/person_dokument.jart?publikationsid=58684&mime_type=application/pdf},
Abstract= {"Achieving low unemployment in an environment of weak growth is a major policy challenge; a more egalitarian distribution of hours worked could be the key to solving it. Whether work-sharing actually increases employment, however, has been debated controversially. In this article we present stylized facts on the distribution of hours worked and discuss the role of work-sharing for a sustainable economy. Building on recent developments in labor market theory we review the determinants of working long hours and its effect on well-being. Finally, we survey work-sharing reforms in the past. While there seems to be a consensus that work-sharing in the Great Depression in the U.S. and in the Great Recession in Europe was successful in reducing employment losses, perceptions of the work-sharing reforms implemented between the 1980s and early 2000s are more ambivalent. However, even the most critical evaluations of these reforms provide no credible evidence of negative employment effects; instead, the overall success of the policy seems to depend on the economic and institutional setting, as well as the specific details of its implementation." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsmarktentwicklung; nachhaltige Entwicklung; work sharing; Beschäftigungseffekte; Reformpolitik; ökonomische Faktoren; institutionelle Faktoren; Rezession; Arbeitszeitentwicklung; Arbeitsverteilung; Überstunden - Auswirkungen; Lebenssituation - Zufriedenheit; Arbeitszufriedenheit; Arbeitsmarkttheorie; Industrieländer; OECD; Europäische Union; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 1929; E 2013},
Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: D1; D3; E24; J08; J2},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191030r12},
}
***************************
5. MONOGRAPHISCHE LITERATUR
***************************
@Book{Alcidi:2019:EMW,
Institution={Centre for European Policy Studies (Hrsg.)},
Author= {Cinzia Alcidi and Daniel Gros},
Title= {EU mobile workers: A challenge to public finances? : Contribution for informal ECOFIN, Bucharest, 5-6 April, 2019},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {32},
Address= {Br{\"u}ssel},
Annote= {URL: https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/EU%20Mobile%20Workers.pdf},
Abstract= {"This contribution analyses recent trends in labour mobility within the EU and considers the challenges it generates in sending countries. It finds that mobile workers abroad can make a significant contribution to the GDP of their host countries and that the incomes of mobile citizens abroad can be of considerable benefit to those who stayed at home.
However, large-scale (net) emigration could have negative effects on the source country. Negative effects of outward mobility can arise through brain drain and when emigration erodes the tax base, making it more difficult for governments to finance current expenditure and to service (a large) public debt. Within the EU, the evidence of brain drain appears limited to southern euro area countries. The negative impact of the erosion of the tax base through emigration is mitigated by lower expenditure needs and additional VAT revenues on the expenditure financed by remittances. For high debt countries, population ageing exacerbated by mobility, rather than mobility alone, is the main issue for debt sustainability.
A key finding is that with ongoing reductions in wage gaps, in the future, differences in structural factors may be more important than (after-tax) income in the decision to emigrate. States which struggle the most to enhance the quality of the life of their citizens, through effective public spending and provision of high quality public goods, may experience the largest outflows of workers." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: internationale Migration; Arbeitskräftemobilität; ausländische Arbeitnehmer; Ost-West-Wanderung; öffentlicher Haushalt; brain drain; Herkunftsland; Geldüberweisung; Auslandstätigkeit; Steueraufkommen; öffentliche Einnahmen; Europäische Union; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2007; E 2017},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191015r14},
}
@Book{European:2019:OJV,
Institution={European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Hrsg.)},
Title= {Online job vacancies and skills analysis : A Cedefop pan-European approach},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {36},
Address= {Thessaloniki},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-896-2850-1},
Abstract= {"Over recent decades, online job portals have become important recruitment and job search tools. Beyond assisting skills matching, the job vacancies these portals gather can also be used to analyse labour market trends in real time, generating evidence that can inform education and training policies and help ensure that people's skills meet the needs of rapidly changing workplaces. These insights can complement skills intelligence based on information collected via traditional methods, such as Cedefop's Europe-wide skills forecasts, the European skills and jobs survey, and the European skills index. This booklet outlines the main features of online job vacancies and the key characteristics of Cedefop's new system to collect and analyse them. It accompanies the first release of results based on the collection and analysis of online job vacancies in seven EU Member States." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Jobbörse; Stellenangebot; Qualifikationsanforderungen; Qualifikationsbedarf; Analyseverfahren; Informationssystem; CEDEFOP; Datenanalyse; Datenqualität; Informationsgewinnung; Berufsbildungssystem; Personalbeschaffung; Europäische Union; Tschechische Republik; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Irland; Spanien; Frankreich; Italien; Großbritannien; },
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191015r13},
}
@Book{European:2019:MWI,
Institution={European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Hrsg.)},
Title= {Minimum wages in 2019: Annual review},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {49},
Address= {Dublin},
Series= {Eurofound research report},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-897-1881-3},
Abstract= {"In most EU Member States, reviews of the statutory minimum wage rates spark a great deal of public interest. Such reviews affect the wider workforce, beyond those workers on the statutory minimum wage. Pay rates in collective agreements may be adapted in response to an increase in the minimum wage, affecting lower-paid workers more generally; social benefits may also be affected, making the impact of such revisions even more widespread. This report covers developments in statutory minimum wages in 2018 - 2019 in the EU and Norway. It looks at the level of minimum wages, how they were set and how they have developed over time in nominal and real terms. It also covers major debates in relation to setting minimum wage levels. While the report focuses on the net remuneration of those receiving the minimum wage, it also documents minimum rates from selected collective agreements in countries without statutory minimum wages as well as minimum wage coverage rates of workers by gender." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Mindestlohn - internationaler Vergleich; Lohnhöhe; Lohnentwicklung; Kaufkraft; Lohnpolitik; Tarifverhandlungen; Geringverdiener; Beschäftigungsentwicklung; Europäisches Haushaltspanel; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; Norwegen; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2010; E 2019},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191030v26},
}
@Book{European:2019:SEE,
Institution={European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Hrsg.)},
Title= {Seniority-based entitlements: Extent, policy debates and research : National context analysis Germany},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {37},
Address= {Dublin},
Series= {Eurofound research report},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-897-1861-5},
Abstract= {"Seniority systems - schemes that allot improving employment rights or benefits to employees as their length of employment increases - have not been widely studied. This report provides the first comprehensive study comparing the design and spread of seniority-based entitlements (SBEs) in Europe and mapping related policy debates. It is primarily based on contributions from the Network of Eurofound Correspondents, covering the 28 EU Member States and Norway, but also presents aggregate seniority-earnings curves for the EU based on data from the Structure of Earnings Survey. The aim of the report is to take stock of the currently existing different types of SBEs in the private and public sectors. It concludes that despite an obvious trend to remove them from regulations or reform them, a substantial amount of such entitlements is here to stay. Paradoxically, countries which have regulations on seniority pay in place tend to have flatter aggregate seniority-earnings curves than countries without such regulations." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Anciennitätsprinzip - internationaler Vergleich; Lohnhöhe; öffentlicher Dienst; demografischer Wandel - Auswirkungen; Berufsverlauf; Kündigungsschutz; Arbeitsbedingungen; ältere Arbeitnehmer; Reformpolitik; Gleichstellungspolitik; Betriebszugehörigkeit; Privatwirtschaft; institutionelle Faktoren; Tarifverhandlungen; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; Norwegen; },
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191030v27},
}
@Book{European:2019:EJM,
Institution={European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Hrsg.); European Commission's Joint Research Centre and Eurofound (Hrsg.)},
Title= {European Jobs Monitor 2019 : Shifts in the employment structure at regional level},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {92},
Address= {Dublin},
Series= {Eurofound research report},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-92-897-1982-7},
Abstract= {"Accumulating evidence indicates that large metropolitan centres are faring much better than other regions within the Member States of the EU. Such interregional inequality contributes to disenchantment with existing political systems, which in turn can weaken the social bonds that ground democratic systems.
This is the context for the 2019 edition of the European Jobs Monitor, which analyses shifts in the employment structure - meaning change in the distribution of employment across occupations and sectors - of the EU regions. The analysis covers 130 regions of 9 Member States, which together account for nearly 4 out of 5 EU workers. The study finds that, while Member States are becoming more similar in their employment structures, regions within the same country are becoming more disparate. It also finds that cities have a disproportionately high share of well-paid, high-skilled services employment alongside growth in low-paid employment. The findings support continued EU regional policy assistance of regions in danger of being left behind." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: Beschäftigungsentwicklung; regionaler Vergleich; regionale Disparität; Wirtschaftsstruktur; regionale Faktoren; Berufsgruppe; sektorale Verteilung; qualifikationsspezifische Faktoren; Beschäftigungsentwicklung - internationaler Vergleich; Belgien; Tschechische Republik; Frankreich; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Italien; Polen; Spanien; Schweden; Großbritannien; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2002; E 2017},
Annote= {Sprache: en},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k191030v24},
}
@Book{Philipps:2019:BVI,
Annote= {Sign.: vs.0743;},
Author= {Veronika Philipps},
Title= {Die Bedeutung von Institutionen f{\"u}r die Weiterbildung {\"A}lterer : Eine vergleichende Studie erwerbsbezogener Weiterbildungsteilnahme in Europa},
Year= {2019},
Pages= {281},
Address= {Wiesbaden},
Publisher= {Springer VS},
Series= {Research},
ISBN= {ISBN 978-3-658-28004-8},
Abstract= {"Veronika Philipps untersucht in ihrer empirischen Studie, welche Institutionen die Länderunterschiede in Europa bei den relativen Nachteilen Älterer in der erwerbsbezogenen Weiterbildung erklären. Die Befunde unterstreichen die hohe Bedeutung von Arbeitsmarkt- und Bildungsinstitutionen für die Weiterbildungsbeteiligung von Personen in der späten Erwerbsphase, insbesondere weitreichende staatliche und betriebliche Weiterbildungsstrukturen sowie ein duales Berufsausbildungssystem. Damit werden neue Erkenntnisse zur in der Weiterbildung unterrepräsentierten Gruppe der Älteren gewonnen, indem das Verfahren der Qualitative Comparative Analysis zur Analyse der Wirkung von Kombinationen von Institutionen genutzt wird.
Der Inhalt:
Strukturelle und institutionelle Bedingungen der Weiterbildungsteilnahme
Theoretische Perspektiven auf Weiterbildung und altersbezogene Unterschiede
Überblick über weiterbildungsrelevante institutionelle Faktoren in Europa
Länderspezifische relative Nachteile Älterer in der Weiterbildung" (Autorenreferat, IAB-Doku)},
Annote= {Schlagwörter: ältere Arbeitnehmer; Weiterbildungsbeteiligung - internationaler Vergleich; institutionelle Faktoren; altersspezifische Faktoren; Arbeitsmarktpolitik; Beschäftigungssystem; Weiterbildung; Bildungspolitik; Adult Education Survey; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Dänemark; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Irland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Österreich; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Norwegen; Schweiz; Serbien; },
Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2011; E 2012},
Annote= {Sprache: de},
Annote= {IAB-Sign.: vs.0743},
Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k190918801},
}
24 von 467 Datensätzen ausgegeben.