Suchprofil: Gender_wage_gap
Durchsuchter Fertigstellungsmonat: 04/19



   Journal= {European Sociological Review},
   Number= {online first},
   Author= {Benita Combet and Daniel Oesch},
   Title= {The gender wage gap opens long before motherhood : panel evidence on early careers in Switzerland},
   Year= {2019},
   Pages= {14},
   ISBN= {ISSN 0266-7215},
   Abstract= {"According to a popular argument in economics, the gender wage gap persists not because of employer discrimination against women, but because of the differential investment of fathers and mothers into paid work and the household. We test this argument by comparing the evolution of wages between men and women before the onset of family formation and gendered household specialization. We use a cohort study of young adults for Switzerland (TREE 2000 - 2014) and match the two sexes on their intellectual ability and educational attainment before they enter the labour market. We then use the ensuing survey waves to account for human capital and job characteristics as well as for values towards work and family. We replicate our analysis with a second panel study of Swiss graduate students. We find in both cohort studies an unexplained gender wage gap of between 3 to 6 percent in favour of men. This result suggests that young women earn lower wages than young men with the same productive characteristics long before they have children. Translated into annual wages, this means that young women lose out on half a monthly wage each year in comparison to young men." (Author's abstract, IAB-Doku) ((en))},
   Annote= {Schlagwörter: Lohnunterschied; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Berufsverlauf; erwerbstätige Frauen; erwerbstätige Männer; junge Erwachsene; Elternschaft - Auswirkungen; Beruf und Familie; Lohnentwicklung; Lohndiskriminierung; Schweiz; },
   Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2000; E 2014},
   Annote= {Sprache: en},
   Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 863},
   Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k190408v19},

   Journal= {Economics letters},
   Volume= {175},
   Number= {February},
   Author= {Helmuth Cremer and Kerstin Roeder},
   Title= {Income taxation of couples, spouses' labor supplies and the gender wage gap},
   Year= {2019},
   Pages= {71-75},
   ISBN= {ISSN 0165-1765},
   Abstract= {"We study the taxation of couples when female wages do not reflect their true productivity. We show that the expression for the marginal tax rates of the male spouses is the same as in a Mirrleesian world where wages reflect true productivities. Marginal taxes for the female spouses are reduced because of a Pigouvian correction. Consequently, the wage discrimination pleads for a lower marginal tax on the female spouse. Furthermore, the distortion of a couples' tradeoff between male and female labor supply is the same as in a Mirrleesian world without a gender wage gap. It only depends on true productivities and not on wages. In other words, the tax system completely neutralizes the extra distortion introduced by the wedge between the female spouse's wage and her true productivity." (Author's abstract, © 2018 Elsevier) ((en))},
   Annote= {Schlagwörter: Ehepaare; Einkommensteuer; Besteuerung - Auswirkungen; Arbeitskräfteangebot; Ehepartner; Ehemänner; Ehefrauen; Lohnunterschied; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Lohndiskriminierung; Mütter; },
   Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: H21; H31; D10; J16; J22},
   Annote= {Sprache: en},
   Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 1292},
   Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k190404v02},

   Journal= {International journal of manpower},
   Volume= {40},
   Number= {2},
   Author= {Claudia Pigini and Stefano Staffolani},
   Title= {Teleworkers in Italy: who are they? Do they make more?},
   Year= {2019},
   Pages= {265-285},
   ISBN= {ISSN 0143-7720},
   Abstract= {"Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the determinants of the probability of being a teleworker and the extent of earnings differentials between teleworkers and traditional employees.
The analysis is grounded on a theoretical framework depicting endogenous telework assignment and wage variations based on individual bargaining. The empirical strategy allows for non-random telework assignment, generating from individual- and job-specific observed as well as unobserved factors.
Results are based on the Italian labor force survey and uncover a key role of gender, higher education and family composition as determinants of the probability of teleworking. Furthermore, teleworkers enjoy a wage premium ranging between 2.7 and 8 percent.
Accounting for observed individual and job-specific effects, by both standard linear regression and propensity score matching, largely reduces the extent of wage premium emerging from unconditional descriptives; the results of an endogenous switching regression model however suggest that failing to properly care for unobserved factors leads to the underestimation of returns to telework." (Author's abstract, © Emerald Group) ((en))},
   Annote= {Schlagwörter: Telearbeitnehmer; Lohnunterschied; Normalarbeitsverhältnis; Arbeitsmotivation; soziale Faktoren; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Telearbeit; qualifikationsspezifische Faktoren; Beruf und Familie; Einkommenseffekte; Italien; },
   Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2008; E 2013},
   Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J22; J31; J81; C34; C14},
   Annote= {Sprache: en},
   Annote= {IAB-Sign.: X 267},
   Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k190410v19},

   Journal= {Industrial relations},
   Volume= {58},
   Number= {2},
   Author= {Katrien Stevens and Stephen Whelan},
   Title= {Negotiating the gender wage gap},
   Year= {2019},
   Pages= {141-188},
   ISBN= {ISSN 0019-8676},
   Abstract= {"There is some evidence that gender differences exist in the propensity to negotiate and outcomes from negotiation. We examine the propensity to negotiate over pay with the employer, the wage outcomes resulting from negotiation, and the impact on the gender wage gap. We find evidence that females are less likely to have the opportunity to negotiate over pay. However, conditional on the opportunity to negotiate, they are no less likely to actually negotiate. The analysis does not provide strong evidence that women fare worse than men if negotiation occurs." (Author's abstract, Published by arrangement with John Wiley & Sons) ((en))},
   Annote= {Schlagwörter: Lohnunterschied; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Lohnfindung; erwerbstätige Frauen; erwerbstätige Männer; Verhandlungstheorie; Einkommenseffekte; Individualisierung; Australien; },
   Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2007; E 2011},
   Annote= {JEL-Klassifikation: J31; J16},
   Annote= {Sprache: en},
   Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 090},
   Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k190325v06},


   Journal= {Intereconomics},
   Volume= {54},
   Number= {2},
   Author= {Christina Boll and Andreas Lagemann},
   Title= {The gender pay gap in EU countries : new evidence based on EU-SES 2014 data},
   Year= {2019},
   Pages= {101-105},
   ISBN= {ISSN 0020-5346},
   Abstract= {"Gender differences in wages are a persistent pattern in most European countries. This study analyses the earnings divide between men and women and the driving forces behind it in 26 countries. In 2014, the cross-country gender pay gap stood at 14.2%. However, country-level results differ tremendously with high gaps of more than 20% in Estonia and Germany and gaps below 5% in Belgium, Luxembourg, Slovenia and Romania. While part of the earnings divide can be explained by gendered sector affiliation and the high share of atypical employment among women, a large portion of the gender pay gap remains unexplained by the data. Even though the gender pay gap statistics are unable to identify the (non-)existence of discrimination, it still calls for diverse measures both at the state and the firm level." (Author's abstract, © Springer-Verlag) ((en))},
   Annote= {Schlagwörter: Lohnunterschied - internationaler Vergleich; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; erwerbstätige Frauen; erwerbstätige Männer; Lohndiskriminierung; Frauenberufe; Europäische Union; Belgien; Bulgarien; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; Estland; Finnland; Frankreich; Griechenland; Italien; Lettland; Litauen; Luxemburg; Malta; Niederlande; Polen; Portugal; Rumänien; Schweden; Slowakei; Slowenien; Spanien; Tschechische Republik; Ungarn; Großbritannien; Zypern; Kroatien; Norwegen; },
   Annote= {Bezugszeitraum: A 2014; E 2014},
   Annote= {Sprache: en},
   Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 127},
   Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k190405v01},


   Journal= {Deutscher Bundestag. Drucksachen},
   Number= {Dr 19/8842 v 29 03 2019},
   Institution={Bundesministerium f{\"u}r Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend; Deutscher Bundestag, Fraktion Die Linke},
   Title= {Arbeit geschlechtergerecht und diskriminierungsfrei bewerten : Antwort der Bundesregierung auf die Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten und der Fraktion DIE LINKE (Drucksache 19/8314)},
   Year= {2019},
   Pages= {5},
   ISBN= {ISSN 0722-8333},
   Annote= {URL:},
   Abstract= {Die Bundesregierung antwortet auf die Anfrage der Fraktion DIE LINKE zu Stand und Ursachen der Entgeltlücke zwischen Männern und Frauen und den Möglichkeiten der diskriminierungsfreien Bewertung von Arbeit. (IAB)},
   Annote= {Schlagwörter: Arbeitsbewertung; geschlechtsspezifische Faktoren; Frauenberufe; Männerberufe; Diskriminierung; Arbeitswerttheorie; Tarifvertrag; Lohnunterschied; erwerbstätige Frauen; erwerbstätige Männer; Einkommenseffekte; Bundesrepublik Deutschland; },
   Annote= {Sprache: de},
   Annote= {IAB-Sign.: Z 198},
   Annote= {Quelle: IAB, SB Dokumentation und Bibliothek, LitDokAB, k190411r04},

6 von 230 Datensätzen ausgegeben.